Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/26/2007 8:39:24 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Petraeus"

Sounds like a fer'ner to me...

2 posted on 01/26/2007 8:51:44 AM PST by USMMA_83 (Tantra is my fetish ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The White House, President George W. Bush

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
January 26, 2007

President Bush Congratulates General Petraeus on Senate Confirmation, Discusses Way Forward in Iraq
The Oval Office

     Fact sheet In Focus: Defense

10:20 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: I just had a full briefing with General David Petraeus about the way forward in Iraq. I want to thank the Secretary, and General Pace, National Security Advisor, for joining this discussion. Congratulations.

GENERAL PETRAEUS: Thank you, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: The Senate confirmed this good man without a dissenting vote. I appreciate the quick action of the United States Senate. I appreciate them giving General David Petraeus a fair hearing, and I appreciate the vote. My instructions to the General is, get over to the zone as quickly as possible and implement a plan that we believe will yield our goals.

I thank the General and his family. I particularly want to thank your family for supporting you and supporting our nation. One of the amazing things about our country is that we've got military folks who volunteer to go into a tough zone to protect the American people from future harm, and they've got families who stand by them. Whether you be a general or a private in the military, there is a U.S. -- there's a family member saying, I love you and I support you.

And so, General, I congratulate you and I congratulate the volunteers and their families for making the hard decisions necessary to protect its people from a grave danger. And you're going into an important battle in this war on terror, and I give you my full support, and wish you Godspeed.

GENERAL PETRAEUS: Thank you, Mr. President. If I could thank the Senate, as well, thank my family, and above all thank those great soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and civilians who are out there on the front lines of the global war on terror.

THE PRESIDENT: All right. I'll answer a couple of questions. Jennifer.

Q Thank you, sir. The other night in your State of the Union address, you asked Congress to give your plan a chance. But lawmakers, Democrats and Republicans, didn't really miss a step in starting to turn out resolutions against that plan. Why do you think it's okay to go ahead without their support?

THE PRESIDENT: One of the things I've found in Congress is that most people recognize that failure would be a disaster for the United States. And in that I'm the decision maker, I had to come up with a way forward that precluded disaster. In other words, I had to think about what's likely to work.

And so I worked with our military and I worked with Secretary Gates to come up with a plan that is likely to succeed. And the implementor of that plan is going to be General Petraeus. And my call to the Congress is, is that I know there is skepticism and pessimism, and that they are -- some are condemning a plan before it's even had a chance to work. And they have an obligation and a serious responsibility, therefore, to put up their own plan as to what would work.

I've listened a lot to members of Congress. I've listened carefully to their suggestions. I have picked the plan that I think is most likely to succeed, because I understand, like many in Congress understand, success is very important for the security of the country.

Let's see -- Steven.

Q This policy of going after the Iranians inside Iraq, are you concerned that that could be a provocative act in the region?

THE PRESIDENT: I made it very clear, as did the Secretary, that our policy is going to be to protect our troops in Iraq. It makes sense that if somebody is trying to harm our troops, or stop us from achieving our goal, or killing innocent citizens in Iraq, that we will stop them. That's an obligation we all have, is to protect our folks and achieve our goal.

Now some are trying to say that because we're enforcing -- helping ourselves in Iraq by stopping outside influence from killing our soldiers or hurting Iraqi people that we want to expand this beyond the borders -- that's a presumption that simply is not accurate. We believe that we can solve our problems with Iran diplomatically, and are working to do that. As a matter of fact, we're making pretty good progress on that front. As you know, the Iranians, for example, think they want to have a nuclear weapon. And we've convinced other nations to join us to send a clear message, through the United Nations, that that's unacceptable behavior.

And so, yes, we're going to continue to protect ourselves in Iraq, and at the same time, work to solve our problems with Iran diplomatically. And I believe we can succeed. The choice is the Iranian government's choice. And one of the things that the Iranian government has done, is they've begun to isolate their nation to the harm of the Iranian people. And the Iranian people are proud people, and they've got a great history and a great tradition.

Our struggle is not with the Iranian people. As a matter of fact, we want them to flourish, and we want their economy to be strong. And we want their mothers to be able to raise their children in a hopeful society. My problem is with a government that takes actions that end up isolating their people and ends up denying the Iranian people their true place in the world. And so we'll work diplomatically, and I believe we can solve our problems peacefully.

Thank you all very much.

END 10:26 A.M. EST


Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070126.html


3 posted on 01/26/2007 8:52:22 AM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (We are going to win!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

When did the Senate get the power to approve an appointment of an individual to a particular military command? Wouldn't that be the exclusive power of the President as the Commander in Chief?


4 posted on 01/26/2007 8:53:13 AM PST by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
From the Blogosphere:

In the Senate Committee hearing :

*************************

When questioned directly, Petraeus said he would not be able to do his job as commander of MNFI without the additional 21,000 troops President Bush has pledged to Iraq.

See :

Re: What would you say to this sending a message thing if you could say what you thought...

**********************************************

Commentary link at the Blog:

So, the Politicans will not let the General do his job.

5 posted on 01/26/2007 8:54:03 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

What about Senator be-tray-US?


13 posted on 01/26/2007 9:13:50 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Pelosi, the call was for Comity, not Comedy. But thanks for the laughs. StarKisses, NVA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Why would the democrats vote to confirm the man who thinks we can win the war in Iraq by increasing troops? Don't the democrats think it's stupid to increase the troops? Do they think we should have stupid people running our military operations?


16 posted on 01/26/2007 9:22:20 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

How did Nebraska Senator BeTRAYus vote?


26 posted on 01/26/2007 10:06:44 AM PST by thelastvirgil (Lest ye put all your faith in the government to provide for you, check their track record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

So the commander in chief has to ask the senate who the lead general is in iraq? /confusion


33 posted on 01/26/2007 2:25:30 PM PST by omega4179 (Communism: Its back and arming Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson