Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Colonel Kangaroo
I believe it would have developed into something much more oppressive than anything we've ever seen out of Washington DC.

I don't think it would have lasted long enough to. A nation founded in blood and fire upon the proposition that its constituent territories can leave at will would likely have balkanized into mini nation-states in a generation or two.

222 posted on 02/01/2007 12:10:15 PM PST by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird
I don't think it would have lasted long enough to. A nation founded in blood and fire upon the proposition that its constituent territories can leave at will would likely have balkanized into mini nation-states in a generation or two.

That's a good point that I overlooked. Contrary to the unhistorical myths associated with confederate nostalgia, there was no unified southern nation. The rebellion was a political power grab by the slaveowning elite temporarily fueled by a burst of strong, but false and shallow, regional fervor. The idea of "southern nationhood" had no staying power in war and there's no reason to believe that it would have endured long in peace either.

223 posted on 02/02/2007 7:00:50 AM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson