Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China censorship damaged us, Google founders admit
The Guardian ^ | January 27, 2007 | Jane Martinson

Posted on 01/26/2007 8:34:38 PM PST by george76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Enduring Freedom

do no evil

for free


21 posted on 01/27/2007 1:16:15 AM PST by Enduring Freedom (President Bush - Your Public Relations Team Sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom

do no evil

that doesn't pay


22 posted on 01/27/2007 1:16:37 AM PST by Enduring Freedom (President Bush - Your Public Relations Team Sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wodinoneeye

Also, the oppressed in China longing for more freedom were no dummies. They figured out lots of ways of getting past the Great Firewall, from using elgooG to sophisticated anonymizing servers.


23 posted on 01/27/2007 1:17:51 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Northern Alliance

And Google news is terrible.

I never go there anymore.


24 posted on 01/27/2007 6:57:08 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; sam_paine; Zhang Fei
LOL

getting past the Great Firewall...

25 posted on 01/27/2007 6:59:43 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Google has not been damaged. They were a POS yesterday. They are a POS today. They will be a POS tomorrow. So see, it's all good from my point of view. They are still on the same path. Oh, yeah; and about that global warming? I don't take jets, don't have air conditioning, and keep my house at 65 degrees. I can't do more, so trim the flying budget, Googler staff.
26 posted on 01/27/2007 7:08:08 AM PST by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All

About Google as a company - I am inclined to believe they have a hair salon and nail salon available to the employees during their workday....possibly a workout gym and sauna...

Outrageous? Of course - it is a fantasy I have yet...somehow seems appropriate for that bunch.


27 posted on 01/27/2007 7:12:43 AM PST by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: george76
Larry Page said: "I believe in the future of newspapers," before admitting that he reads all his news online.

Like all good socialists Page believes in a fishwrap future. His giggle company tries to reimagineer fishwrap as an Inet printer device.
28 posted on 01/27/2007 7:50:10 AM PST by Milhous (Twixt truth and madness lies but a sliver of a stream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wodinoneeye

Kind of like the elected offical in the sewer called Washington, only at a smaller scale.


29 posted on 01/27/2007 9:27:20 AM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: george76; discostu
Well, well, the hotshots at Google discover that maybe there should be room on the balance sheet for morality.
30 posted on 01/27/2007 9:48:29 AM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

They discovered there's room on the balance sheet for bad press, which is what turned this into a negative for them.


31 posted on 01/27/2007 10:15:48 AM PST by discostu (Feed her some hungry reggae, she'll love you twice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: discostu
They discovered there's room on the balance sheet for bad press, which is what turned this into a negative for them.

Maybe they hope that one day the world press will be controlled like it is in China. After that, morality will not be a problem for them.

The reality is the the press will always be a factor, and therefore, morality is a factor.

32 posted on 01/27/2007 10:52:24 AM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: george76
"... was accused of selling out and reneging on its "Don't be evil" motto..."

It's actually "do no evil," but hey.
33 posted on 01/27/2007 11:05:38 AM PST by Terpfen (Got a problem? It's now Pelosi's fault!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Nut the press isn't always moral. The reality is there's always going to be bitchers and whiners and they're always goign to complain, you just have to figure out which bitchers and whiners you want to piss off, and suffer the consequences. And try not to give the rare correct bitchers and whiners anything legitimate to complain about, that tends tobe the stuff that's most expensive.


34 posted on 01/27/2007 11:18:32 AM PST by discostu (Feed her some hungry reggae, she'll love you twice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: discostu
The reality is there's always going to be bitchers and whiners and they're always goign to complain

And you would put the people who complained of Google's support for Chinese tyranny in what catagory - "the rare correct bitchers and whiners" or the incorrect "bitchers and whiners"?

35 posted on 01/27/2007 12:33:48 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Enduring Freedom

Businesses like Google that play patty-cake with tyrants for a few extra bucks show us that the first priority of business is to make money, by ANY MEANS POSSIBLE.

Just because we have free enterprise doesn’t mean that businesses VALUE freedom. They will take a subsidy just as quickly as they’ll take a voluntary transaction from customers.

Thanks goodness we still have a competitive economic system with choices, and can switch away or boycott them.

If they ever manage to find a way to Gerrymander consumer spending, we’re doomed.


36 posted on 01/27/2007 1:34:05 PM PST by 4Liberty ( forced charity = theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

I think they'd be in the general noise bitchers and whiners, people with a valid point but with an opposite number with an equally valid point. Once somebody officially mentioned China in a Google meeting room they were in a position where somebody was going to complain about their actions. They could either ignore China, which would mean leaving a lot of potention money on the table, something that really irritates investors; or they could go into China which means following Chinese rules which means irritating all the people that don't like China. Either way Google was screwed, when in doubt remember you're a profit seeking company and seek the profit.


37 posted on 01/27/2007 3:47:49 PM PST by discostu (Feed her some hungry reggae, she'll love you twice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Doesn't answer the question of what's right thing to do, enable a oppressive regime or turn away profits. Google is finding that taking the profits is hurting them in the long run. But it sounds like you blame that on the "whiners".

So many things in the world would have gone so lovely if it weren't for the whiners. Imagine what the Third Reich would have accomplished if it hadn't been for all those pesky moralists.
38 posted on 01/27/2007 6:51:09 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Sometimes there isn't an answer. Once a company has taken investors the officers of the company have a duty to seek profit for those investors, that is their job. No actually Google is finding that going after China is hurting them in the short run, China is a long run move but they seem to be getting more short term pushback than they were expecting. I'm not blaming anybody, I'm simply stating it how it is, ALL corporate moves cause people to bitch and complain, sometimes they're right, sometimes they're wrong, most times they're just pointless because the counter move would cause just as much complaint from some other quarter.

And now you've gone into idiotic hyperbole land. This is a search engine, it's not the Third Reich, time to get back to the concept of scale here. Had Google not attempted to enter the Chinese market the Chinese people would be no less opressed than they are with Google having a foot in the door. Imagine what you could accomplish if you actually used the tools of logic rather than strained silly red herring comparisons.


39 posted on 01/27/2007 7:07:27 PM PST by discostu (Feed her some hungry reggae, she'll love you twice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Sometimes there isn't an answer.

But one choice is always better than another. I can't understand why would anyone believe that doing business with China would be a long-term benefit. Almost everyone, including the Chinese believe that the US and China will one day be at war. That can't be good for companies that have an investment there.

Setting up a business in a dictatorship is insane. You can't trust dictators to protect your business interests. Companies that did business in Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union lost big-time.

The trouble with people who get in bed with mobsters or dictators is they really don't understand the concept of morality as a business value. As a result, they end up getting screwed. You have to be able to trust people you do business with.

40 posted on 01/28/2007 9:53:49 AM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson