Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: curiosity
I think of the coast as being below 250 feet elevation, for the purposes of all the land based ice in the world melting.

46 posted on 01/28/2007 9:53:29 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: William Terrell
I would venture to say that perhaps not a majority, but a very large fraction of the world's population lives below 250 feet in elevation and near the coast.

Think about some of the world's largest cities: New York, Tokyo, Singapore, Shanghi, Hong Kong, etc, etc, etc.

47 posted on 01/28/2007 10:40:07 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: William Terrell
FYI:

"44% of the world's population (more people than inhabited the entire globe in 1950) live within 150 kilometres of the coast. In 2001 over half the world's population lived within 200km of a coastline... The United States has clearly mapped its population expansion. In the United States, around 53% of the population lives near the coast and since 1970 there have been 2000 homes per day erected in coastal areas."

Source:

http://www.oceansatlas.org/servlet/CDSServlet?status=ND0xODc3JmN0bl9pbmZvX3ZpZXdfc2l6ZT1jdG5faW5mb192aWV3X2Z1bGwmNj1lbiY1NT0yMSYzMz0qJjM3PWtvcw~~

Anyway, my point is, even if melting land ice only reduces the livable land mass by a small amount, it will still cause a huge displacement since such a large fraction of the population lives near the coast.

49 posted on 01/28/2007 11:23:27 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson