Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bean Counter
So the question is why are the containments suddenly so vulnerable to attack from the air? I have no doubt that a crashing jet would inflict serious and disabling damage to a nuclear power plant, but I believe that this scenario was foreseen long ago, and engineered into the critical structures right from the start in order to minimize an obvious hazard from the air.

Maybe. I recall watching a program about the Twin Towers in NYC, and why they fell. There was a comment about how when the building was engineered they considered the possibility of a plane hitting the tower. They were focused on the forces that a Boeing 707/727/737 would produce. At the time the Twin Towers were designed, 747's and other wide-body jumbo jets were unknown to the public.

They also stated that their focus was on 'what would happen if a plane accidentally hit a tower'. They NEVER gave consideration (as most people) to what would happen if a modern jumbo jet, fully loaded with fuel were intentionally flown into the structure.

It was the fuel load and resulting fires that brought the towers down.

10 posted on 02/01/2007 6:36:49 AM PST by Jambe ( Save the Cows ! -- Eat a Vegan !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Jambe
They NEVER gave consideration (as most people) to what would happen if a modern jumbo jet, fully loaded with fuel were intentionally flown into the structure.

Plus, the planes apparently were on full throttle as well, which significantly increased their kinetic energy over a moving much more slowly during a normal takeoff or landing.

13 posted on 02/01/2007 7:02:40 AM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08 - rationalization not required, he IS a conservative already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson