Posted on 02/02/2007 7:59:56 AM PST by SmithL
You seem to be itching for a fight today. I'm not. I hope something nice happens for you today.
Did i do that? If i did, i'm really sorry!
So does this mean that if Eisenhower or Lincoln or Teddy Roosevelt had an affair, that means they would have betrayed regular Americans?
Yet another in a long line of sexually deviant San Francisco mayors. What a waste of a beautiful city.
No, have no intentions of fighting, just did not and do not understand the point you were trying to make. Sorry if I came across as heavy.
> Yet another in a long line of sexually deviant San
> Francisco mayors.
Chasing 20 year old females in skirts is "deviant"?
Who knew?
> No, if the media were different, this story would've been
> written differently. Get it now???
Setting aside, for the moment, the fact that we'll never be able to test this because (as someone else pointed out) the John Birch Society will be led by a card carrying socialist a long time before San Francisco gets a Republican mayor, how do you think this "would've been written differently"?
> For all you know, that could be Sparkling Cider, or water.
Why on earth would he care if the accusation was true or not?
Per the Karl Rove playbook, the only thing that matters is that the accusation is made.
I didn't say anything about betraying regular Americans. I said the people of SF deserve to know what they've got, and that they probably don't care anyway.
Who would have thought that NYC could have four consecutive terms of GOP mayors? If things get bad enough in San Fransisco I suspect it could happen there too.
The story would be much more hostile in it's judgment of what Newsom has done and would probably contain more sordid details in an attempt to enrage the community.
Altho, this is all hypothetical because we're talking about SF here and as someone else on this thread said, in SF there wouldn't be a GOP mayor. And SF being what it is there would be very little if any outrage in the community.
I would agree except the woman with whom he had the affair was his subordinate. The mayor has now put the city in a position where they can be sued.
> The story would be much more hostile in it's judgment of
> what Newsom has done and would probably contain more
> sordid details in an attempt to enrage the community.
Seems to me she pretty much came out and called him immature, unwise, impulsive and dishonorable. I'm not sure it gets much more hostile than that.
And I don't think it's a Rep/Dem thing. Seems to me that Giuliani got a pretty easy time of it for being a horndog, too, didn't he?
Maybe you're comparing it to cases like the preacher in Colorado? Those guys got raked over the coals, not for being horndogs, but for being lying hypocrites.
LOL
I was trying to make the point that it normally wouldn't matter if a mayor is having an affair. When the same mayor is having an affair with an employee who works directly for them, the mayor has exposed the city to a potential lawsuit.
The laws do not apply in SF.
Some in SF actually work at jobs and pay taxes.
We're talking about SF here. This man broke laws while he was mayor. He isn't a mediator he's an instigator.
Rule #1 in re SF Politics: Laws are only to be applied to or against anyone -- but not those running the city!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.