Posted on 02/02/2007 8:59:28 AM PST by Mount Athos
I hope he posted his own $50,000 bond. Any Bondsman who would take $5,000 and put up $45,000 for this guy must be crazy to think he is staying around for the trial.
As a matter of principle, I refuse to capitalize the word islam, although I understand your caps as emphasis. Yes, you are correct in that our so-called "leaders" refuse to name the enemy and refuse to take the steps necessary to at least help insure our common good and safety. The borders are open, the mosques throughout the country preach against us, the convenience stores are all too often fronts and money laundries for our enemies. It's as if the government thinks that if we show all these people some "good ol' American hospitality" they'll change their minds about slitting our throats.
And, oddly, about as under-rated as Poe in his day.
Niether one got their props until after they passed on.
Gee, nothing to see here....
Does Beslan ring any bells?
Semper Fi
(Precisely my same thought. Another case of "gun-grabbing.")
Hello EM,
You are 10000000000000000000000000000000000% correct. It is apparent many of our "leaders" have sold us out from the top to the bottom. The truth is, they will not be safe in their protected enclaves when the jihadists come a calling.
The PC traitors and feel good liberals will be easy prey for the moslems still living in the 7th century.
Myself I would love to see all the moosleems and illegals deported on a one way ticket. P.S that would include all their sympathizers & enablers as well.
To me, "They ain't nothin, but a thang just another islamic chicken on a strang."
Respectfully,
NSNR-CSAOTL
Guy is an immigrant, no wife, no kids, and he gets out on a $50,000 bail.
Anyone wanna bet he's gone in the wind? Next stop Pehawar or Kandahar.
You know, the sad thing about it is that whenever there is another attack on America, even if it happens 5 years from now, it's going to be blamed on President Bush because he refused to close the borders. He did it all because he wanted to advance his global agenda.
You're right, but I don't think it's unfair to hold him responsible. I mean, we hold Clinton responsible for his failure to act after the '93 WTC attack, the embassy bombings, etc., don't we? All those thing led to 9/11 and Bush's failure - his arrogant refusal - to close the borders will cause problems and he should be blamed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.