Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
I said the whole exchange, meaning the interaction between us on the whole thread. How about this.

My #54: "The more the Party refuses to have a unified agenda, the more votes are going to swing on individual candidates. As the Contract with America shows, a unified, objective agenda is a winning strategy. As the failure to follow through on it and becoming Beltway Drones shows, 535 different agendas is not. You still haven't answered my question: what does the Republican Party stand for, unequivocally?"

Your reply #55: "Look, you can talk and talk and post and post and rationalize and rationalize; the fact remains that there are only two parties in the running.

If you want to leave the GOP, leave.

But the GOP is NOT going to move farther to the right than it is right now -- especially since it cannot count on the far rights vote."

My #56: "You still haven't answered my question: what does the Republican Party stand for, unequivocally? Can't think of any? I listed a whole raft of things to pick from [ viz.#37, same thread ], many of which are hardly "far right". Surely at least a few must be Republican Core Values."

That help your recall any?

144 posted on 02/06/2007 5:06:57 PM PST by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird

Yeah, I see it; but I don't see where you and I were arguing over the CWA.

And, btw, I made replies on this thread to questions that were ASKED of me; I am not in any way, shape, or form, advocating this route.


145 posted on 02/06/2007 5:16:26 PM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson