Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/08/2007 3:20:06 AM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Flavius
Fadavi was also quoted by the state broadcaster's Web site as saying that the warhead of this missile had the capacity to sink "all kinds of big warships".

At least that's what the Russian salesman told him!

2 posted on 02/08/2007 3:22:38 AM PST by airborne (Elect an Airborne Ranger,Vietnam Veteran for President ! Duncan Hunter 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Oh what BS these Iranians can come up with.


3 posted on 02/08/2007 3:26:38 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Here's the problem with that logic.

You may be able to sink big warships with your Russian made missiles.

The big question is can you sink them all at once?

And please remember my good friend, lots of our big warships don't travel on the surface.
5 posted on 02/08/2007 3:29:16 AM PST by SomeoneNeedsToSayIt (Socialism: If we ALL can’t be wealthy… we ALL will be poor…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
"Big Warships"

Like this one?


6 posted on 02/08/2007 3:31:09 AM PST by Niteranger68 (Point your toilets towards Mecca!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
There are a couple of carrier groups in the Persian Gulf for them to practice on.

The US Navy has a lot of balls to be cruising around in that little pond begging Iran to take their best shots.

8 posted on 02/08/2007 3:35:54 AM PST by Jeff Gordon (History convinces me that bad government results from too much government. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Whom do you think they're playing to? The LSM media?

The relatively tiny Stark did not sink when sucker punched by Iraq. I doubt they can land a lethal blow to a U.S. carrier. If they try real hard they may sink one or two smaller U.S. ships, but at enormous cost, in terms of reprisals.

One thing is certain, if they fire on a U.S. ship, their nuclear weapons program is soooo over.
9 posted on 02/08/2007 3:46:42 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (When I search out the massed wheeling circles of the stars, my feet no longer touch the earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

I'm waiting for the article that says "US testing missiles that will sink small countries."


11 posted on 02/08/2007 4:05:28 AM PST by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

They might be able to sink big ones, but they'll *not* likely sink ours. Our US Navy is more ready than in the past. It's good to see that they're so focused on what's in front of them, though. [s]

If Iran fires, her leaders' fantasies of power will evaporate overnight. The whole problem will be solved very quickly and with very few US and civilian casualties. We'll hear about it when it's virtually over.


12 posted on 02/08/2007 4:14:37 AM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Iran says tests missiles able to sink "big warships"


US Navy says, "Go Ahead, Make Our Day".


13 posted on 02/08/2007 4:23:19 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
The trap is baited.

We await 28 years of payback.


BUMP

16 posted on 02/08/2007 4:36:07 AM PST by capitalist229 (Get Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

We should fire a couple of missles over Iran as a ditto.


18 posted on 02/08/2007 4:39:43 AM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

"to show that Iran is able to confront any possible threats."


Except for our counter-measures and that annoying, blinding white flash.


24 posted on 02/08/2007 5:07:24 AM PST by wolfcreek (Please Lord, May I be, one who sees what's in front of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

If Iran fires on a US warship...and sinks one...hell will come to them swiftly.


32 posted on 02/08/2007 6:07:15 AM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Well, so what. We've done a couple of tests ourselves. Hiroshima and Nagasaki


35 posted on 02/08/2007 6:08:57 AM PST by william clark (DH4WH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Wouldn't denegrate their missiles. On a floating container packed with fuel and explosives, anything could be dangerous.
Lets just hope the Sov, er, Russians didn't sell 'em the Yahkont, or the Indians sell them the BrahMos. Both of 'em are fast (3000 kph) and long ranged (300 km) with sophisticated guidance systems.

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htart/articles/20070207.aspx


39 posted on 02/08/2007 6:17:23 AM PST by Little Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

For all their faults, the Iranians are not mentalists.

They WILL NOT conduct a first strike on a US ship,k let alone a carrier.

However, if they are attacked first, then they would - quite rightly IMO - retaliate.

The question is if Israel attacks ... and they retaliate by hitting US targets.


43 posted on 02/08/2007 6:30:23 AM PST by Thunderpants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

I'm quite sure they can "hit" big warships with the following caveats:

1) not maneuvering/engines inoperative
2) radar inoperative
3) Seawhiz NMC


60 posted on 02/08/2007 7:00:26 AM PST by roaddog727 (BullS##t does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson