Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ricardobaltazar
You're mostly right but I'd bet that red state children would be more likely to get hooked on meth...

My understanding is that the only part of the country that hasn't seen meth (yet) is the Northeast and that likely to be because we see most trends last because were farthest away from California.

21 posted on 02/09/2007 11:27:09 AM PST by Gay State Conservative ("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

And that's the whole reason why these stats are pretty pointless. The spread of meth is basically something that's sweeping from one side of the country to another. There's a lot more factors to why states are ranked a particular way for a certain category than party affiliation.


30 posted on 02/09/2007 11:34:05 AM PST by ricardobaltazar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson