Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mechanical Failure Suspected in Most Recent Iraq Chopper Crash
American Forces Press Service ^ | Donna Miles

Posted on 02/09/2007 4:06:11 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Feb. 9, 2007 – A Marine Corps CH-46 Sea Knight helicopter that went down in Iraq’s Anbar province Feb. 7 most likely experienced a mechanical failure, the director of operations for the Joint Staff told Pentagon reporters today.

Army Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute said early indications show the crash, which killed seven crewmembers and passengers, resulted from a mechanical malfunction.

Lute said eyewitness accounts factored with considerations about the type of aircraft, its flight pattern and other early indicators, led to that conclusion. “So the response of the aircraft leads the people on the ground to believe, early in the investigation, that it was mechanical,” he said.

The crash was the latest of six involving helicopters in Iraq recently, four of them U.S. military helicopters and two contractor helicopters.

Of these, Lute said, four appear to be attributable to enemy fire -- two while in close contact with the enemy and another two when not in enemy contact.

Another incident, involving a contractor aircraft, is likely the result of pilot error and involved a wire strike, he said.

Lute said it’s too soon to tell if the crashes that resulted from enemy activity indicate any change in enemy capabilities. At this point, he said, there’s no definite evidence that missiles were involved in the surface-to-air fire that likely brought down the four helicopters.

Other recent crashes of military helicopters include:

--A UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter crashed northeast of Baghdad on Jan. 20. Four crewmembers and eight others soldiers aboard as passengers were killed in the incident.

-- A Multinational Division Baghdad helicopter crashed north of Najaf on Jan. 28, killing two U.S. soldiers.

-- A U.S. Army helicopter crashed north of Baghdad on Feb. 2. Two crew members were killed in that crash.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: boeingbodybag; ch46; chopper; crash; failure; frwn; iraq; mechanical

1 posted on 02/09/2007 4:06:13 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
FR WAR NEWS!

WAR News at Home and Abroad You'll Hear Nowhere Else!

All the News the MSM refuses to use!

2 posted on 02/09/2007 4:06:54 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
It seems like maybe helicopters aren't the way to go anymore. They seem to go down awfully easy. That's probably not the case statistically, but every one of those "debit column" statistics means a Good Guy dead.

I hope someone in charge is taking a look at this.

3 posted on 02/09/2007 4:09:47 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The last CH-46 to come off the Boeing/Vertol production line was delivered to the Marine Corps in February of 1971 and had its first flight in the FMF on 18 March 1971.


  PHIRST PHLEET PHLIGHT OF THE PHINAL PHROG by LtCol Larry W. Britton, USMC (Ret)


While watching the coverage of the Iraqi War, particularly reports on the Marines and seeing ‘46s in action, I was reminded of a significant flight I took in a CH-46F some thirty-two years ago.

I was a Captain assigned to HMM-264 at New River, NC. My job assignment at the time was that of Aircraft Maintenance Officer. We had received notification that a new CH-46F was ready for pick-up from the Boeing-Vertol factory in Philadelphia, and I had been scheduled to take delivery of the airplane.

Accompanied by my crew, consisting of a co-pilot and my trusty Quality Assurance Chief, a gunnery sergeant, we were flown to Philadelphia and dropped off. As the aircraft was being prepared for our pre-flight inspection, I was informed by the Boeing-Vertol people that this was the last new CH-46 off the assembly line. It bore the manufacturing sequence number 427 and BuNo. 157726. It was the Final Frog!

Following the pre-flight/QA inspection, the factory people worked off those Safety of Flight discrepancies that had been identified by the crew. Once the work had been satisfactorily completed, CH-46F, BuNo. 157726 was formally accepted by the Marine Corps. It was launched from the Boeing-Vertol factory thirty-two years ago on 18 March 1971, on its first flight as a member of the Fleet Marine Forces to its new home with HMM-264, MAG-26, MCAS New River, NC. The date of that first flight is particularly significant to me as it was my twenty-eighth birthday. When we arrived at New River after an uneventful flight, the base paper, “The Rotorview”, ran a picture and article on the delivery of “The Phinal Phrog”.



A CH-46E of HMM-264.

157726 had specially configured wiring to accept IHAS and SCNS. IHAS was an Integrated Helicopter Avionics System while SCNS was a Self-Contained Navigation System. These two systems had been developed for the ’46, but apparently had never been put into production. Because of this unique configuration, the bird was ordered to be transferred to HMX-1 at Quantico. I assume it was to be used as the test bed for the evaluation of IHAS and SCNS. Following its transfer to HMX, I lost track of the Phinal Phrog. I can only hope it is one of the less than 200 ‘46s still in service today.

During my nearly 23 years of active duty, I logged nearly 3,000 hours in the ’46 and came to know it as an extremely capable and rugged airplane. I credit my successful completion of several missions in Vietnam to the ruggedness of the airplane in spite of the ham-handedness of the young Lieutenant at the controls. Seeing the ’46 still serving the Marine Corps in Iraq today, I can only add my endorsement to the bumper sticker produced by Boeing a few years ago, which read. “Phrogs Phorever. Never trust a helicopter under thirty.”

(Ed: I asked LtCol Britton if there was, in fact, really an "F" model of the CH-46 and this was his response. "Yes, it was a CH-46F. The F model had only minor engineering changes from the D model. The only change I can recall was in the gyro compass system. It still had the GE T-58-10 engines. The GE T-58-16 engines didn't come along until the E model. I don't know why the series went A, D, F, and E. Maybe NAVAIR can shed some light on this?")

Web site question?
Contact us
Powered By:
MarineCorps.com Home


MCAA

4 posted on 02/09/2007 6:11:11 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

The real problem is that many types are reaching the end of their life span. Remember, that the Dems think the troops can do without so that Princess Pelosi gets Royal style perks.


5 posted on 02/09/2007 6:17:53 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson