[JohnHuang2]

God bless and have a great weekend, y'all.

[Allegra]

[Allegra]

[YaYa123]

"On Monday, after hours and hours of floor debate on Iraq, Sen. Harry Reid held a news conference accusing the GOP of blocking floor debate on Iraq. In an epochal shift, the New York Times agreed with Democrats and accused Republicans of blocking debate. Here's how it goes: Reid puts forth a motion to cut off debate, the GOP blocks the motion to cut off debate. Democrats then run to the press complaining hysterically that the GOP is blocking debate. The press then responds by quoting the Democrats that the GOP is blocking debate. The Democrats then cite the press as proof that the GOP, by blocking the motion to cut off debate, is trying to cut off debate -- a charge that is highly debatable"

By jove, I think I've got it.

Thanks JohnHuang2! Once again you've clarified what really happened.

[D-fendr]

Well done!

btt

[Nachoman]

Did you hear this Iman on Hannity's radio show yesterday? He ranted for 5 minutes to avoid answering Sean's question: "Is Hezbollah a terrorist organization?"

And the Dems think we need more dialog with these people.

[M Kehoe]

Good morning.

I have a criticism. This sentence...

if you had to sum up the Democrats' latest 'deeply held' pathology on Iraq, it would go something like this: We need troop caps, the troops aren't safe, don't send reinforcements, bring back the draft, there ain't enough troops, the surge is too big, no evidence this surge is enough, more troops = more targets, send more troops to Afghanistan, troops are mercenaries, we support the troops, don't support the mission, troops are torturers, Abu Ghraib, we support the troops, troops need more armor, must stop the funding, can't stop the funding, this war's a mistake, must win this mistake, this war's unwinnable, troops doing a marvelous job, troops losing the war, need a troop cap and if the cap fits you musta quit.

...is factual (although I would have tolerated the attributions to aforementioned democRAT congresscritters), it is a run on sentence, with poor syntax, and generally not up to the standards of "My Two Cents."

Having said that, why aren't you syndicated yet, or have the editors job at the Washington Post or the NYT?

Ok, I know the answer to the second part...

5.56mm

[kittymyrib]

"...he was against the war Hillary and Edwards voted for before they voted for it even though they now say they were tricked into voting for it by a 'moron.'"

Yes, obviously the Smartest Woman in the World and Lord Edwards (he lives in a palace, you know) are not fit to lead this country, if they were tricked by a guy they say is stupid. This point should be thrown in their faces in every interview, but the Leftist msm is too busy propping up Democrats.

[NewCenturions]

Bump

[CyberAnt]

My favorite highlights were:

"It's this stunning display of clarity which has BushCheneyHalliburton doing circles around libbies and why the Democrats' credibility on Iraq right now is just about even with horse dung. And now the Democrats' Terrorists Encouragement Resolution seems bogged down in a quagmire too. A week ago the resolution was a slam-dunk.

"Democrats claim they've got a 'mandate' from voters to stop the war but they can't muster enough support to even stop debate about debate over a meaningless resolution. Yeah, let's have these guys run the war."

As usual .. you make more sense than ABCCBSCNNNBC all put together.

[patriciaruth]

:-) Fun read. Thanks!

[dokmad]

"The Imam stopped short of calling for beheadings and more 9/11s, so Democrats insist he's a "moderate."

Now that's scary!!

Thanks JH2, as usual, Love your postings..