Actually, my recollection of you as a poster through the years is somebody who I do see common ground with and somebody who is not a spammer. Instead (and I'm not trying to flame you) I see you as somebody who mistakenly believes that the time of Reagan was actually better than now. While others on this board have trashed you for things I have pretty much refrained from piling on at least while they were trashing you.
That said, last night you said a simple statement that Rudy was liberal on all social issues. I corrected you on it and I spent time (late at night when I should have been sleeping) and I gave you a good list to back up my claim. Instead of either agreeing with me or disputing my list, you gave me a non-sequitur question to answer and then you blamed me for not answering it and for being argumentative.
Maybe it's because I said when making my correct point that "you don't know what you are talking about". If you think that's an inappropriate response then just say so. Don't start flailing all over the place making false arguments and accusations about me.
Here's another of your false arguments. Something about me supposedly trying to boil down your list(that I agree with) into only three subjects.
There are many subjects/topics contained on my list of major social issues that could be debated. You want to boil them down to three issues and ignore all the rest. Kind of leaves you standing around with no way out. And looking real foolish to boot.
LOL! What?
Anyway...
That was the close of my last post to you. So far, you haven't extricated yourself from anything and remain entrenched in crapola up to your neck.
I'm not so sure if we had that much common ground in our past debates. But there is obvious common ground between us on Rudy Giuliani being wrong on the general topics of abortion, the 2nd amendment and illegal immigration. The problem all along has been your unwillingness to accept Rudy`s entire liberal record on every major social issue ---- not to mention his false credentials as a fiscal conservative, which we can get to later on, if you like.
From the get-go our debate has centered around the list of issues I raised with you and Rudy`s obvious agreement on those issues with every major liberal Democrat alive today. From Hillary Clinton to Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Joe Lieberman and Algore. Issues you refuse to even acknowledge exist. Social issues relevant to any debate of a serious GOP candidate for POTUS. Sorry, running away, won't make them go away.
Btw, referring to someone as a "spammer" for posting Rudy`s real liberal record, is a cheap pot shot, with no bearing on the facts. Also, bringing up Reagan has absolutely nothing to do with this debate. However, if you thought something could be gained by piling on, you would act accordingly. No doubt about it.
So what'll it be? Face the facts of Rudy`s liberal-leftwing extremism, or continue ignoring reality, in your borderline fantasy state of mind?