To: Nuc1
Of course. SCOTUS is the battleground. I tried to find something on Rudy's historreer: appointments in NYC, for what that would be worth. Not much, imo.
So, we are left with his stated intention to appoint a certain type of judge. If he is true to his own stated position on Roe, I don't see how that bodes well for conservatives.
145 posted on
02/11/2007 7:45:08 AM PST by
don-o
(Duncan Hunter for President. Inform yourself. You won't have to hold your nose!)
To: don-o
"So, we are left with his stated intention to appoint a certain type of judge. If he is true to his own stated position on Roe, I don't see how that bodes well for conservatives."
I can't fault your logic here. I believe any pubbie (well, most any) will be better by miles than any rat in the race now. Anyway, that is my two cents. I have empathy for your position on voting, however and the record of "trusting" presidents about their judicial appointments sure isn't good.
203 posted on
02/11/2007 2:11:30 PM PST by
Nuc1
(NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson