Posted on 02/11/2007 12:05:33 PM PST by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - Sworn testimony in the perjury trial of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby has shone a spotlight on White House attempts to sell a gone-wrong war in Iraq to the nation and Vice President Dick Cheney's aggressive role in the effort.
Special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald rested his case against Cheney's former chief of staff on Thursday in a trial that has so far lasted 11 days. The defense planned to begin its presentation Monday.
The drama being played out in a Washington courtroom goes back in time to the early summer of 2003. The Bush administration was struggling to overcome growing evidence the mission in Iraq was anything but accomplished.
The claim about weapons of mass destruction that was used to justify the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003 had not been supported. Insurgent attacks were on the rise. Accusations were growing that the White House had distorted intelligence to rationalize the invasion.
Trial testimony so far — including eight hours of Libby's own audio-recordedd testimony to a grand jury in 2004 — suggest that a White House known as disciplined was anything but that.
What has emerged, instead, is:
_a vice president fixated on finding ways to debunk a former diplomat's claims that Bush misled the U.S. people in going to war and his suggestion Cheney might have played a role in suppressing contrary intelligence.
_a presidential press secretary kept in the dark on Iraq policy.
_top White House officials meeting daily to discuss the diplomat, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, and sometimes even his CIA-officer wife Valerie Plame.
Libby is accused of lying to the FBI and the grand jury about his talks with reporters concerning Plame. Libby got the White House press secretary to deny he was the source of the leak. He says he thought he first heard about Plame's CIA job from NBC's Tim Russert.
But after checking his own notes, he told the FBI and the grand jury Cheney himself told him Plame worked at CIA a month before the talk with Russert, but Libby says he forgot that in the crush of business.
Cheney already was helping manage the administration's response to allegations that it twisted intelligence to bolster its case on Iraq when Wilson's allegation — in a New York Times op-ed piece on July 6, 2003 — came into his cross hairs.
Cheney told Libby to speak with selected reporters to counter bad news. He developed talking points on the matter for the White House press office. He helped draft a statement by then-CIA Director George Tenet. He moved to declassify some intelligence material to bolster the case against Wilson.
Cheney even clipped Wilson's column out of the newspapers and scrawled by hand on it: "Have they done this sort of thing before? Send an ambassador to answer a question? Do we ordinarily send people out pro bono to work for us? Or did his wife send him on a junket?"
Cheney and Libby discussed the matter multiple times each day, according to Libby's grand jury testimony.
A former Cheney press aide, Cathie Martin, testified she proposed leaking some news exclusives but was kept partly in the dark when Cheney ordered Libby to leak part of a classified intelligence report. Later she arranged a luncheon for conservative columnists with Cheney to help bolster the administration's case.
"What didn't he touch? It's almost like there was almost nothing too trivial for the vice president to handle," said New York University professor Paul Light, an expert in the bureaucracy of the executive branch.
"The details suggest Cheney was almost a deputy president with a shadow operation. He had his own source of advice. He had his own source of access. He was making his own decisions," Light said.
Wilson had written that he had not discovered any evidence that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was seeking uranium in Africa. Wilson also asserted that the administration willfully ignored his findings.
Bush mentioned the unsubstantiated Africa connection in his State of the Union address in 2003. The White House and the CIA disavowed the 16-word assertion shortly after Wilson's criticism appeared in print.
A week after Wilson's article, his wife's CIA employment was disclosed in a column by Robert Novak, who wrote that two administration officials told him she suggested sending the former ambassador on the trip.
The disclosure led to a federal investigation into whether administration officials deliberately leaked her identity. Her job was classified and it is a crime to knowingly disclose classified information to unauthorized recipients.
Libby, 56, is not charged with that. He is charged with lying to the FBI and obstructing a grand jury investigation into the leak of Plame's identity. Libby is the only one charged in the case.
Cheney was upset by Wilson's suggestion that his trip was done at the vice president's behest and that the vice president had surely heard his conclusions well before Bush repeated the Niger story in his speech.
The CIA later said Wilson's mission was suggested by his wife but authorized by others. The agency said Wilson's fact-finding trip was in response to inquiries made by Cheney's office, the State Department and the Pentagon.
Testifying for the prosecution, former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said he was surprised to find the administration was backing off the 16 words that he had been defending. He said it wasn't the first time he spoke of the administration's position with great certainty, only to find it had changed and nobody had bothered to let him know.
Fleischer acknowledged passing along Plame's identity to two reporters. But he testified he did not know at the time that her CIA job was classified.
According to prosecution testimony, Libby had conversations about Plame's identity with Cheney as well as with a Cheney spokeswoman, a undersecretary of state and two CIA officials before he talked to Russert. In addition, former New York Times reporter Judith Miller and former Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper testified that Libby discussed Plame's CIA employment with them.
Russert, the final witness for the prosecution, flatly denied Libby's assertion that the two had discussed Plame before Novak's column appeared.
On the grand jury tapes, Libby also described steps that Cheney took to use parts of a 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, a classified assessment of Iraq's weapons capabilities, to rebut Wilson.
Among those not informed about this Cheney maneuver, according to the Libby tapes, were then-White House chief of staff Andrew H. Card Jr., then-CIA Director George J. Tenet and then-national security adviser Condoleezza Rice.
"What was interesting to me was what appears to be the total involvement of the vice president," said Stephen Hess, a presidential scholar who worked in the Eisenhower and Nixon White Houses. "If he's down to micromanaging news leaks and responses at that level, I found that quite astounding."
Meantime, it's become clear that Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage was the first to disclose Plame's work to reporters — Washington Post editor Bob Woodward and then Novak. Armitage says it was a mistake, claiming he didn't know her job was classified.
Ultimately, he, Fleischer and special presidential adviser Karl Rove all have acknowledged talking to reporters about her. According to testimony, at least six reporters were privately told by top administration officials of Plame's connection with the CIA.
What a boatload. It is amazing what passes for journalism these days.
AP has obviously thrown all pretense of neutrality out the window and decided to let its reporters write editorials in the guise of "news".
It's clear the AP no longer bothers running their stories past the DNC. They just let them write it and then print it.
I was looking for a pic of Tom, no luck, he's been going at it for 30 years or more. Time for him to move on.
EDITOR'S NOTE — Tom Raum has covered Washington for The Associated Press since 1973, including five presidencies.
here's one from late 2005.
--
Newsview: Leak Shines Light on White House ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1504531/posts
Posted by NormsRevenge
On News/Activism ^ 10/18/2005 6:58:42 AM PDT · 66 replies · 1,811+ views
And they have the gall to take the VP to task for actually defending against treasonous garbage like wilson, plame and this article.
Media....Tools of, by, and for....our enemies!!!!
:-(
Ashcroft should be rubbed all over with poison ivy for doing his job so badly, neglecting his duty to the administration and to basic justice and letting Fitzgerald take charge of this case and illegally run with it. It's now provided almost four years of propaganda.
So what if there's no crime and no evidence? So what if Fitzgerald has violated the terms of the independent counsel law passed by congress? So what if the defense lawyers made a fool of Russert? So what if the person who actually leaked Plame's name first was never charged? The DNC and the leftist media have gotten four years out of it, and it has helped them tremendously to make the Iraq war unpopular.
The people are better at spinning than Rapunzel, who spun straw into gold.
What this trial has shown is that Fitzgerald pissed away a ton of money and got Squat.
The person who should be on trial is fitzgerald.
It seems all right in the universe reading how the AP is backing a liar and low life like Joe Wilson.
It's not that the AP has such great record this year.
Anyone hear the latest of Jamil Hussein?
""a vice president fixated on finding ways to debunk a former diplomat's claims that Bush misled the U.S. people in going to war and his suggestion Cheney might have played a role in suppressing contrary intelligence.""
False impression. Cheney's activity was a natural response to Wilson's series of leaks culminating with his article under his own name which directly accused the VP of sending Wilson to Niger, learning about Wilson's findings, and then hiding them.
""_a presidential press secretary kept in the dark on Iraq policy.""
Huh? What "policy?
""_top White House officials meeting daily to discuss the diplomat, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, and sometimes even his CIA-officer wife Valerie Plame.""
False, they didn't meet "daily", actually not often at all on the subject.
All this pathetic jerk has to do is alter his first sentence to begin "It was a dark and stormy night......."
He'll win the first prize for sure.
Leni
I think he was last seen playing linebacker for one the NFL teams.
re: overcome growing evidence the mission in Iraq was anything but accomplished
Nobody every said the mission in Iraq was accomplished. One aircraft carrier returning from it deployment at sea for six months returned home and its crew proclaimed "Mission Accomplished" but nobody ever said that applied to Iraq in any way whatsoever.
My bet is they (the MSM) knows how much it galls us conservatives when they take something out of context and then run with it for months and months and months.
I suspect W flying out to and landing on that carrier galls the Left as much as the "Mission Accomplished" thing gets our goat. He should do it again and again, and swagger across the flight deck in his flight suit just to drive them crazy!
What I would really like would be to have him call NASA and tell them he's going along on one of the next launches of the shuttle and then spend some time tooling around the sky in those nifty jet trainers the astronauts all fly.
I want a President who is going to rub salt in the wounds!
Nothing he does is ever going to make them happy or shut them up, he might as well have fun getting under their skin!
Now, we have this basic summary of facts near the top: Libby is accused of lying to the FBI and the grand jury about his talks with reporters concerning Plame.
OK, that's at least accurate. He says he thought he first heard about Plame's CIA job from NBC's Tim Russert.
OK, I think what the author is trying to say here is: The specific charges of lying revolve around Libby's statements to the Grand Jury that he originally heard about Plame from Russert. Subsequent evidence has shown that in fact he heard about it much earlier from administration sources.
Well that could be a deliberate attempt to mislead (of course we know there was not underlying crime at this point, else Armitage would be facing charges
But here comes the weird shocker: But after checking his own notes, he told the FBI and the grand jury Cheney himself told him Plame worked at CIA a month before the talk with Russert, but Libby says he forgot that in the crush of business.
Woah! Stop the train, Sam! So the real story as I see it is that Libby testified about who told him about Plame, checked his notes, figured out he had misspoken, and corrected the error voluntairily. What was the time between the misstatement and the correction?
This becomes ever more surreal as we learn more about it.
Aparently Fitz believes imperfect recollections are a crime, notes are not allowed in the GJ room, and if you consult them afterwords and find you are wrong you will get no credit for setting the record straight.
Based on everything I've seen so far I hope Bush has sent word to Libby that a pardon will be forthcoming the VERY HOUR this absurd pig circus comes to an end, assuming the jury convicts.
It was nice to see Timmy in the dock. Hope that this becomes a trend in the Barrac administration and special prosecutors are used to ferrit out details of reporter/politician conversations and those who resist the star chamber interogations go to jail. Like Judy Miller.
Fishing expedition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.