Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tanniker Smith
When we aren't under attack, we can look at the other pressing issues of the day. But when the enemy is in our face, then that is the overriding demand.

So we can't fight terror and not sign gun control legislation at the same time? We can't hold down domestic spending during the WOT?

I've heard similar explanations before, and quite frankly they sound like excuses to me.

145 posted on 02/11/2007 6:40:01 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
OKAY, PAY ATTENTION.

THE INITIAL QUESTION WAS ABOUT SAVING THE UNBORN VS SAVING THE CURRENTLY LIVING.

I'm not about to vote for any feckless politician who can't handle the crisis the world is in just because he's pro-life.

And I'm not going to eject a proven leader, particularly if he's far beyond anything else worth consideration, because he isn't.

Bring me someone else worth considering and I will consider it.

Ed Koch voted for Bush. Ed Koch agrees with Pres George W. Bush on ONE SINGLE ISSUE, but that was enough to overcome all the other concerns of the otherwise self-proclaimed "liberal with sanity".

I don't expect Rudy to go to Washington and start signing Gun Control legislation his first day on the job. Hell, he can't unless the people elect more Dems and spineless RINOs to write the legislation in the first place.

TS
Conservative with sanity

147 posted on 02/11/2007 6:48:47 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (For the children and the flowers are my sisters and my brothers . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson