To: All
U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton said Mitchell can be called as a witness but he wouldn't allow Libby's attorneys to ask about her inconsistent statements.Well,....why not?
What a circus....
5 posted on
02/12/2007 2:29:58 PM PST by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
but he wouldn't allow Libby's attorneys to ask about her inconsistent statementsA serious constitutional violation? I mean, what about Libby's right to a fair trial? Doesn't sound like he's getting one.
17 posted on
02/12/2007 2:36:01 PM PST by
My2Cents
("I support the right-ward most candidate who has a legitimate chance to win." -- W.F. Buckley)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton said Mitchell can be called as a witness but he wouldn't allow Libby's attorneys to ask about her inconsistent statements."
Because liberal slimebags don't want the jury to hear all the facts - prosecutor and judge would rather see Libby railroaded than have the jury realize that all the MSM bozos were in far more of an illegitimate "conspiracy" than anyone in the WH!!!
19 posted on
02/12/2007 2:36:35 PM PST by
Enchante
(Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson