[USS Alaska]

Well, this will get the "conservative purists" out of their burrows. They will tell us all about their right to vote only for a "true conservative" {we agree, you can be as stupid as you choose} and if the pubbies don't meet their requirements, they will sit the next election out. OK, come on and flame, I'm ready.

[RJL]

Well, this will get the "conservative purists" out of their burrows.

Let's look at the great success in California electing Rino Arnie who promptly moved hard left instead of voting for a true conservative like Tom McClintok.

If Rudy is the best Republicans can do, they deserve to lose.

[PhiKapMom]

ROFLOL!!! You just made my afternoon! Thanks!

[Boiling point]

Ok, How about a tin foil theory? The power elite in Washington on both sides want to socialize America and the fastest way to get there is to run mild socialists Rudy Gulianni against Mitt Romney in the primaries so the true Conservatives vote third party to insure Empress Hillary wins.

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

So we are stupid if we dont fall in behind your rino man rudy huh? Read this; BIOYA Shame you cant find a conservative but then again I guess you need to be a conservative to understand PAL.

[Al Simmons]

Check out what the wonderful conservative warrior, R. Emmett Tyrrell has to say.

I hope and pray that Tyrrell is right, that all factions will come to their senses and unite in the end, around Rudy [or, I would add, whichever candidate gets the nod].

The 'logic' of those refusing to vote for Rudy:

Rudy is a too 'liberal' 'New Yorker' so they will place their de facto vote for missus clinton, a Stalinist New Yorker, albeit fake, (fake New Yorker, not fake Stalinist), who

• as one-half of the 'twofer,' is the proximate cause of 9/11,

• is an abuser of women in her own right,

• is avidly pro-abortion,

• would nominate justices in the mold of Ruth Bader Ginsburg,

• would resume clinton sale of our nuclear secrets and mineral rights to the enemy,

• would sic the IRS and the clinton 'secret police' on all opponents and critics,

• would nationalize healthcare,

• would decimate the military,

• would reinstitute the clinton policy of ignoring of terrorism,

• would raise taxes...

• even as she and her rapist husband rake in millions in quid pro quos for their slush fund foundation,

• would confiscate profits, end capitalism, if she could, etc., etc.

It does the conservative cause no good to become petulant and self-destructive.

Do conservatives really want

• a Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court instead of an Alito, Roberts or Scalia?

• marginalization, if not worse, of their religious beliefs?

• a return to the amorality, immorality and corruption of the clinton years?

• and G-d knows what depth of failure in the War on Terror?

I find it hard to believe that those people aren't able to discern the difference between Giuliani and Clinton. Frankly, if true, it is frightening.

I am advocating for Giuliani not because of his ideology. I am advocating for him because I believe he possesses the qualities that this country desperately needs in these perilous times... and because I believe he, unlike all the others, will win.

The other night, I heard a man who is not perfect, but a man of rare intelligence, humility, warmth, competence, strength and leadership.

We will be fortunate, indeed, and our babies, born and unborn, living and not yet imagined, will be infinitely safer, if he is our next president.