To: Peach
But Kislin said that he and his company were cleared of any suspicion in that investigation and that he received a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles in 1996 notifying him that he no longer was a target. He provided the Center with a copy of the letter, which says, in part, that the prosecutors had "declined to pursue a civil penalty action against Trans Commodities or Sam Kislin."In 1996? The Feds cleared him of any charges under a Clinton Administration? More of the same on this website. This is starting to make FR look foolish when people don't bother to read.
26 posted on
02/15/2007 10:09:39 AM PST by
PhiKapMom
(Broken Glass Republican -- Rudy 08 -- Take back the House and Senate in 2008)
To: PhiKapMom; Peach
Pretty desperate on the part of some Freepers when they have to post articles from 1999 to try and pin something on Rudy all because they have nothing to show for their own dull candidates. But I guess they will do their little "WE GOT RUDY JIGGLY DANCE!" to an empty room.
31 posted on
02/15/2007 10:12:32 AM PST by
areafiftyone
(RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP)
To: PhiKapMom
It's sad, isn't it? Embarrassing for FR as well.
49 posted on
02/15/2007 10:27:13 AM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: PhiKapMom
declining to pursue... is not the same as being cleared.
we saw that with the OIC and the Clintons.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson