Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EU nations move towards common energy policy (Can eUSocialists here be far behind with their plans?)
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 2/15/07 | AFP

Posted on 02/15/2007 10:30:32 AM PST by NormsRevenge

BRUSSELS (AFP) - The 27 EU nations were moving towards a common energy policy, agreeing on cleaner fuel targets while watering down a proposal to force the break up of the sector into production and distribution operators.

"We have made a breakthrough and we have now adopted a draft energy action plan," said German Economy Minister Michael Glos, who chaired Thursday's meeting.

The energy ministers agreed at a meeting in Brussels that bio-fuels should constitute at least 10 percent of fuels used in new vehicles by 2020.

But that 10 percent target will be subject to bio-fuels being available in sufficient quantities for commercial use, and for the necessary legal changes to be made.

"The binding character of this target is subject to production being sustainable, to second generation biofuels becoming commercially available and the fuel quality directive being amended accordingly to allow for adequate levels of blending," the ministers agreed.

They also agreed to increase the use of renewable energy to 20 percent of the EU's total energy consumption by 2020. The current level is just seven percent.

This second objective is non-binding, a fact which will disappoint the European Commission, the EU's executive arm, which first proposed the measures in a wide-ranging policy paper last month aimed at moving the bloc towards a common energy policy.

Neither did the ministers go along with the Commission's proposal to force the "unbundling" of the electricity and natural gas industry into separate production and distribution networks, though they backed the overall objective of an "effective" management separation.

European Union regulators want to split energy utility groups, in electricity and natural gas markets, into separate production and transmission businesses so as to make networks accessible to companies without their own grids.

The proposal by the EU's executive arm split the member states, with France particularly hostile to any idea of an imposed separation of its electricity company EDF and its transportation system RTE.

The energy ministers called on the European Commission to elaborate on its proposals "taking account of the characteristics of gas and electricity sectors and of national and regional markets," according to a joint statement.

They did however acknowledge the overall objective "where possible" of the "effective separation of supply and production activities from network operations," known as unbundling.

This should be based on "independently run and adequately regulated network operations systems which guarantee equal and open access to transport infrastructures and independence of decisions on investment in infrastructure".

The Commission believes that breaking the link between energy suppliers and the operators of distribution networks is required to introduce competition in energy markets.

The "unbundling" of supply and distribution, two functions carried out by monopolistic companies in many countries, is seen as necessary to enable new suppliers to enter national energy markets.

Glos said that when the 27 EU member states get together "it is not always easy to reach a common decision," while describing the original Commission proposals as "balanced".

"We didn't reject and we didn't endorse," said EU energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs, "we endorsed the goal".

He added that clarification was needed on what unbundling means. "Some members interpret it as (forced) privatisation," he said.

The energy ministers debated a package of measures presented by the Commission last month, aimed at launching a common European energy policy.

The theme will be at the heart of debate at an EU summit on March 8-9.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; energypolicy; eu; europeanunion; nations

1 posted on 02/15/2007 10:30:36 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"We didn't reject and we didn't endorse," said EU energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs, "we endorsed the goal".

Well isn't that helpful... almost as good as "approving of the intentions" while ignoring the results or perhaps "supporting the troops but not the mission".

The cognitive dissonance is mind boggling... it really is mass psycosis on a 'society' scale
2 posted on 02/15/2007 10:56:49 AM PST by FreedomNeocon (Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson