Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sols
Nope.

My major was nuclear engineering, I've been working in that field for 30 odd years, and taken several relativity and nuclear engineering classes since.

I KNOW the theory, have taught fusion-fission theory, KNOW the energy-matter conversion equations. Heck, while running a reactor, I've executed those equations, and felt the heat coming from those equations. Those equations describe clearly and accurately TODAY'S physics.

What they describe though IS the "conventional theory" - which is why I said conventional theory is missing some 10^40 supernova's.
16 posted on 02/15/2007 5:41:03 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE
One thing you haven't mentioned is Einstein.

Namely, the further out you look, the further back in time you look.

Hence, any ancient "local" events would by now be far too distributed to be detectable.

17 posted on 02/15/2007 5:45:32 PM PST by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson