Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stirner; NicknamedBob; patton
I have not found a theoretical reason why heavier elements could not have been created in the first BB shock wave and cooling, but many describing the "good fit" that the number of hydrogen and helium nuclei make to the current theories.

But, if as others have pointed out, the current theory means that 99% (75 + 24%) of the current universe can be accounted for, and that 99% is made up of H and He, and these two are all that the astronomers have looked for, then maybe all the missing mass is scattered in a "halo" around the universe, being pushed away from us as individual nuclei, but (literally) at the edge of the visible universe.

But, the missing mass (the mass created when our planet "dust" was created, but which was ejected the wrong directions, isn't radiating or affecting visible light (unlike the galaxy lenses fro gravity) because it is "on the other side" of the visible light and x-rays coming towards us,
44 posted on 02/15/2007 7:29:59 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Like the Miller experiment in the '50's came so close to creating life...but has gotten no closer since, and liklely never will lest we would then likely know what comes after....

Your theory too would seem to present yet another question in creation.

Another opportunity to try and figure out God.

47 posted on 02/15/2007 7:51:15 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson