Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spiff

What's best? A President who publicly opposes abortion but is unable to get strict constuctionalist judges through
Congress or a President who publicly supports abortion but appoints judges to the bench that will uphold the words of the Constitution as the Founders originally intended?


53 posted on 02/16/2007 5:52:01 AM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bratch
"What's best? A President who publicly opposes abortion but is unable to get strict constuctionalist judges through"

If the GOP controlled Senate had any backbone, President Bush would have pushed those judges through. You can't blame the President for that one. How will Rudy get anyone through except liberal judges, especially now that the Democrats will control the Senate?

63 posted on 02/16/2007 5:56:23 AM PST by TommyDale (What will Rudy do in the War on Terror? Implement gun control on insurgents and Al Qaeda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson