Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RedRover
A "cold blooded killer" should be a person who actually killed someone.

So then Saddam Hussein wasn't a "cold blooded killer". Good to know

9 posted on 02/17/2007 8:00:48 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Sheik Hilali: Cultural learnings of Australia for make benefit of most glorious nation of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Oztrich Boy; KantianBurke
First of all, you're equating a lance corporal in a squad to the absolute ruler of a country. That's pretty moronic.

Secondly, if Saddam Hussein killed someone with his own hands, yes, he's a cold blooded killer. I have no idea if he did or not. That was not among the reasons I supported the war in Iraq, and still do.

Lastly, I find it of passing interest that you and KantianBurke (if you're not one and the same) use Murtha's accusation about the Haditha Marines--as if Murtha is now vindicated. You may not realize this is a different group of Marines. Also, Murtha will never be vindicated. He called the Haditha Marines cold blooded killers while an investigation was ongoing, disregarding their right to a presumption of innocence.

10 posted on 02/17/2007 8:11:46 PM PST by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Oztrich Boy

Saddam Hussein actually did kill someone. Several people actually. And I don't mean as the ruler of Iraq.


15 posted on 02/17/2007 8:40:25 PM PST by ConservatismNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson