Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2007 (That didn't take long)
House.gov ^ | 12/13/2007 | Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York

Posted on 02/20/2007 5:58:18 AM PST by xmission

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last
To: xmission

Hmmmm, and the Progressive Liberals call us Nazi's?


81 posted on 02/20/2007 7:42:10 AM PST by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
When the weapons become illegal or are required to be registered, they will know just where to come to get them.

And then you will have to make the very hard decision whether or not to give them up or take second amendment action. If you decide not to give them up your life expectancy will suddenly drop, but then so will the life expectancy of a number of bureaucrats and politicians.

82 posted on 02/20/2007 7:46:05 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
A true conservative could win that matchup handily. That's why I've just signed on as a volunteer for Duncan Hunter.

I just contributed to the Ron Paul exploratory campaign. :-) May the best conservative win! (and may Rromney McCain Clinton Osama and Guiliani all rot in hell)

83 posted on 02/20/2007 7:48:57 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Doc91678

I get enraged each time I hear that.


84 posted on 02/20/2007 7:49:06 AM PST by xmission (Dont isn't a strategy, Freedom isn't Free, Dems encourage our enemy,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: xmission

Gee. We could get wrapped around the axle trying to analyze and rebut pages of BS, playing into their incrementalism, or...

...we could put the same energy into overturning 922(o) - a single friggin' sentence - and get _everything_ plus the happy switch.

Don't play their game.
Flank 'em.
Overturn 922(o) already.


85 posted on 02/20/2007 7:56:32 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Princip. Conservative

Much more sweeping. Practically eliminates semi-autos with detachable magazines.


86 posted on 02/20/2007 7:58:41 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

I'm all for that.


87 posted on 02/20/2007 8:01:14 AM PST by xmission (Dont isn't a strategy, Freedom isn't Free, Dems encourage our enemy,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: GingisK; ExSoldier

There's at least 3 of us who believe in the 2nd.


88 posted on 02/20/2007 8:05:07 AM PST by B4Ranch (You're in America now. Here we speak English.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

You forgot to mention re " life expectancy" "and the officers designated to collect them".


89 posted on 02/20/2007 8:08:16 AM PST by B4Ranch (You're in America now. Here we speak English.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
You forgot to mention re " life expectancy" "and the officers designated to collect them".

I sort of consider them to be "bureaucrats," but yes you're correct.

90 posted on 02/20/2007 8:11:17 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
I just contributed to the Ron Paul exploratory campaign. :-) May the best conservative win!

I like Ron Paul a lot. If he wins the nomination I'd be more than happy to support him. The thing we must be super careful about it to not tear each other to shreds in the nomination process! That's a for the RATs to do to each other, while we take notes for later use. It's going to be much healthier for our party if we are able to advance our respective candidates by concentrating on the issues and on positive definable plans for the future rather than blind hysteria and ugly campaign politics. Right?

91 posted on 02/20/2007 8:13:38 AM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: xmission

Freedom bump!


92 posted on 02/20/2007 8:16:16 AM PST by stevio (Rudy? Don't make me puke.(NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xmission
What part of "shall not be infringed" doesn't compute? Christ!

And perhaps someone could explain this to me:

`(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any firearm that--

`(A) is manually operated by bolt, pump, level, or slide action;

What's a "level" action? Is that where you cycle a round with a little air bubble in a tube full of colored liquid? /sarc

IDIOTS!

And from what I can see, it's a carbon-copy of the 94 legislation with some verbiage changes and the capacities restricted even more.

93 posted on 02/20/2007 8:27:36 AM PST by rarestia ("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / Molwn Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
The thing we must be super careful about it to not tear each other to shreds in the nomination process!

Well I'll be happy to shred a RINO like Julie Annie or McCaniac but on the whole I agree.

94 posted on 02/20/2007 8:35:22 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
What part of "shall not be infringed" doesn't compute?

Once you allow any infringement, the line becomes subject to movement. SCOTUS has established that any right can be limited some for "reasonable" reasons - no right is absolute.

The kicker was 922(o). Until then, taxation and other behavior-related restrictions were deemed marginally acceptable and abused accordingly. Once an outright ban on inanimate objects (no post-'86 MGs) was enacted and generally accepted, banning other stuff became acceptable. Raich recently compounded this by ruling that the feds could prohibit stuff, no matter how small or harmless, by merely deeming it an "interstate commerce" matter. AWB I & II abuse this by banning parts, which are small enough to pass under the SCOTUS-approved radar for "shall not be infringed": oh, you can have X so long as harmless part Y is not attached.

"Shall not be infringed" has been generally accepted as "a little infringing, in reasonable or trivial matters, is acceptable".

Rather than pulling leaves off this weed, we need to yank out the root: 922(o).

95 posted on 02/20/2007 8:40:25 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Well I'll be happy to shred a RINO like Julie Annie or McCaniac...

That's why I said each other 'cause neither of them is one of US! But the good guys shouldn't be beating each other up. I have to grudgingly admit that if NEWT gets off the dime, he has possibly the best shot for a standing of decent conservative credentials AND name recognition. But he's got his baggage too, especially in the personal realm. On the whole, I'd rather have a new face like Hunter or Paul.

96 posted on 02/20/2007 10:58:03 AM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: xmission
Can't post the article, but from today's USA Today:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-02-19-police-weapons_x.htm
it is evident that the heat is on.

A look at the Palm Beach Post has the following articles in the last few weeks:
Assault rifles escalate violence:
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/search/content/local_news/epaper/2007/01/28/m1a_streetguns_0128.html
Get the Killer Guns:
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/search/content/opinion/epaper/2007/02/04/m2e_leadedit_assaultguns_0204.html

Interestingly enough, a browse of their last six months under "assault" Fields the following (culled from nationwide stories as well):
two assault rifle shootings
one machete
One drumstick
one threat with assault rifle and two handguns
one solicitation for murder, with promise of an assault rifle for use in job.
one use of a cane to defend against lighter fluid attack
one ball bat assault on an LEO
stabbing
shooting, weapon not specified. Argument with man who was using victim's daughter.
gasoline
car

Not sure where this crime wave is coming from...

Will try to come up with a slew of reports later.
Methinks that a big push is underway.
97 posted on 02/20/2007 11:06:45 AM PST by Apogee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

Long ago I worked with Newt for a common employer. I formed an opinion of him at the time that was less than flattering, and to think that he represents one of the better shots at conservatism makes me seriously disgusted.


98 posted on 02/20/2007 11:07:19 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: xmission

W, if you are reading this, FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY, VETO THIS DAMNED THING if it gets to your desk.


99 posted on 02/20/2007 11:08:10 AM PST by RockinRight (When Chuck Norris goes to bed at night, he checks under the bed for Jack Bauer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Care to share the details?


100 posted on 02/20/2007 11:08:55 AM PST by RockinRight (When Chuck Norris goes to bed at night, he checks under the bed for Jack Bauer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson