Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Reiterates Missile-Defense Plan Not Directed at Russia
The Voice of America ^ | 15 February 2007 | David Gollust

Posted on 02/20/2007 7:12:44 AM PST by A. Pole

The Bush administration reiterated Thursday that the missile defense system it plans to build in central Europe is not directed against Russia. The comments follow a reported warning that Moscow might withdraw from a Cold War-era arms reduction agreement if the U.S. plans go forward. VOA's David Gollust reports from the State Department.

Officials here say Russia has been consulted at various levels about the U.S. missile-defense plans and intentions, and they say they are puzzled by the repeated caustic comments about the envisaged system from Moscow.

The Bush administration announced last month it was opening formal negotiations with Poland and the Czech Republic about basing elements of an anti-ballistic missile system in those countries.

That system, officials said, would be aimed at protecting Europe and the United States from single missile firings or small salvos of ballistic missiles from so-called rogue states, and could in no way neutralize or threaten Russia's large nuclear deterrent forces.

But Russian President Vladimir Putin, at both his February 1 Moscow news conference and policy speech in Munich the following week, denounced the U.S. plans and pledged to adopt a highly effective response.

General Yuri Baluyevsky (Oct 2006)
General Yuri Baluyevsky (Oct 2006)
Thursday, Russian news agencies quoted the chief of Russia's military general staff, General Yuri Baluyevsky, as saying Moscow might pull out of the 1987 accord limiting intermediate-range missiles in Europe if the anti-missile system is built.

In a talk with reporters, State Department Spokesman Sean McCormack said he did not know if the latest Russian warning had been formally conveyed to the United States, but he reiterated the anti-missile plan poses no threat to Moscow.

Sean McCormack
Sean McCormack

"The missile-defense plans and deployments are in no way aimed at Russia," he said. "They are instead designed to help protect the United States and its friends and allies from the possible launch of missiles from rogue states such as Iran."

"We have in fact offered to cooperate with Russia on missile defense issues. That offer of cooperation still stands. I know the Russians have had a reaction to this. I can't tell you exactly why, but it is not for a lack of [U.S.] explanation and assurances," he added.

Under the U.S. plan, a battery of about 10 interceptor missiles would be based in Poland and linked to a sophisticated anti-missile radar system in the neighboring Czech Republic.

U.S. defense officials say the deployment would most likely occur by 2012, when they believe Iran might attain a long-range missile strike capability.

Soon after President Bush took office in 2001, his administration stepped-up efforts to develop a limited anti-missile capability, elements of which are under construction in Alaska.

Domestic opponents of the multi-billion dollar program in Congress and elsewhere say it is destabilizing and unlikely to be operationally effective.

 


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: bohemia; czech; poland; shield

1 posted on 02/20/2007 7:12:46 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lizol; Vorthax; Polak z Polski; Grzegorz 246; Lukasz; JoAnka; warsaw44; anonymoussierra; Juliusz; ..

Bump


2 posted on 02/20/2007 7:14:07 AM PST by A. Pole (Byron:"The future cheats us from afar,Nor can we be what we recall,Nor dare we think on what we are")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

Read my lips -- it's a missle DEFENSE plan. And Russia is complaining because we want to DEFEND AGAINST a Russian missle attack, or an attack from anywhere else for that matter ??? Give it up Putin.


3 posted on 02/20/2007 7:17:06 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

Ivan's just making a lot of noise here, hoping the Democrats will jump in action for him and kill missile defense funding... again.


4 posted on 02/20/2007 7:18:40 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

Seems like the ruskies are as paranoid as ever. It does'nt matter. We go forward with defenses.We can out produce them easily with IRBM's or ICBM's and our missiles are much more reliable and accurate. If they want to continue to threaten our democratic friends and allies we will have no choice but to counter them at every turn. If this is what they want,a new Cold War then game on.Why cant europe have any defense from ballistic missiles,not to mention US forces in the area?Oh right, Ivan has a mafia mentality and likes to hold a gun to peoples heads. Russia hates the US because we are the only nation they cant bully. We also can bite back harder than them.


5 posted on 02/20/2007 7:30:16 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Read my lips -- it's a missle DEFENSE plan.

You cannot separate offensive part from the defensive one. Why? The country which builds the successful anti-missile system will acquire the first strike capability.

6 posted on 02/20/2007 7:32:18 AM PST by A. Pole (Byron:"The future cheats us from afar,Nor can we be what we recall,Nor dare we think on what we are")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

You cannot separate offensive part from the defensive one.
----
True. The best defense, is a good offense. The anti-missle system is also backed by our boomer fleet...with both in place the defensive deterrent is a powerful one. America has never postured for a first-strike nuclear capability. And Ivan is on full-tilt over it...mainly for political purposes as far as Putin goes.


7 posted on 02/20/2007 7:37:23 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Read my lips -- it's a missle DEFENSE plan. And Russia is complaining because we want to DEFEND AGAINST a Russian missle attack

That's exactly what they're complaining about. In so doing, we are violating their sacred, historic right to threaten and bully their neighbors.

8 posted on 02/20/2007 7:40:14 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
You cannot separate offensive part from the defensive one. Why? The country which builds the successful anti-missile system will acquire the first strike capability.

In other words, Russia's concern is that we shall launch a "first-strike" nuke attack on Russia with no provocation?

Even more paranoid than I thought.

9 posted on 02/20/2007 7:42:07 AM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan

Yep paranoia that is dangerous especially mixed with nuclear weapons.We must protect the free world against it.


10 posted on 02/20/2007 7:44:45 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
The country which builds the successful anti-missile system will acquire the first strike capability.

That's why you have a strategic triad.

11 posted on 02/20/2007 8:22:36 AM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson