Posted on 02/20/2007 10:38:36 PM PST by AFA-Michigan
You still haven't refuted a single thing that Camenker put into his report on Romney.
Spiff I could take your words or anyone can take our words and show them in such a light that they are taken out of context!
Where does the brickering end? the mocking and belittling that only stils contempt instead of finding ways to stand firm on one's core values and also leaving the other person with their dignity?
I have come to the understanding using labels only antagonized people. I am thinking of those when their buttons are NOT being push are more apt to listen and hear the truth within them.
But with using labels and projecting hostility ends any hope of finding common ground.
As common ground is found that leave room for the good in people to surface to take another step in doing the right thing.
In most situations we are dealing with our fellowman NOT the Terrorist aka Anti Christ etc.
In other words being a hardliner is not going change people "it might help in election" but we still have an angry nation and we still have not grown as a nation because many are still in a hostile rebellious and defendsive state.
There is no room left for others to grow, but to become more contentious. I once thought hardline approach was a good approach, but I am realizing that it was for my own vanity,
It did nothing to improve relationships with those who disagree vermently so one won an election and created more hostilities, not only with the original group but they aquried followers.
For now we will have to agree to disagree!
Cheers!
It is not that they were not out of tune with what the he was saying, its because they were out tune with the Spirit!
Where does the support of abortion, gay marriage, and a whole raft of other liberal garbage that is destructive to the family and our Constitutional republic end? Tell me that. It ends with me. Period. I won't support any candidate who holds such destructive beliefs and who had demonstrated such beliefs through their own governance. In fact, I will oppose those candidates, expose their lies and odious history, and try to stop them from doing any further damage. I've taken down bad guys before who were picked for some pretty powerful positions by digging into their history and exposing them. I won't hesitate when called upon to do it again.
In the office Whitehouse where one can back up their words by action!
Brian Camenker even gone after Bush in his run for president but who was Bush able to nominate to get on the courts!
My feeling is that Brian Camenker is still liberal with in sheep clothing to lead the guilble astray!
His heart can't be soften he is driven.
There is a different when one is strong in their conviction, and when one is a zealot without love.
One need not post gifs of contetnion or saying things that hurtful to get ones point across!
I know I been struggling with this kind of nature myself.
If we are going to stop abortion and other contrary behavior
stiring the pot is not working!
This election is another opportunity to get it right with our fellowman.
It is through love that people want to do the right things!
It is through love that hearts are malleable laws can be changed!
If it were the ONLY switch he ever did, even done in his mature years when it’s rather unlikely....I might believe him too. But he has made too many switches. He’s made a complete change of empty suit.
“Make all the promises you have to.”
When I wrote that I was unaware of his casual discard for the alive embryo-aged humans at IVF clinics which Mitt considers disposable for research. He mouthed pro-life and fooled me. But the truth about the Northeastern liberal sleazy politician finally came out.
By 2004 he has raised 5 boys into their 20’s and 30’s.
And then he decides killing babies isn’t something that should be allowed.
Riiiight..
Mitt we don’t believe you. You are an opportunistic, phony..
I believe Michael sang “Ben”.
Ben, Willard, they’re ALL rats!
Hey, Billie Jean might have been a rat, ya know? ;)
How’s the push-polling robocalls going for the Huckster, Gary?
Even with Romney’s late migration to the prolife side, he stands head and shoulders a better overall candidate than the soft-on-crime tax-and-spend Huckabee.
“Throughout my career, I have had the honor of serving under several Presidents and am proud to make today’s endorsement. No other candidate will do more to advance the conservative judicial movement than Governor Mitt Romney. He knows firsthand how the judicial branch can profoundly affect the future course of a state and a nation. I greatly admired his leadership in Massachusetts in the way that he responded to the activist court’s ruling legalizing same-sex ‘marriage.’ His leadership on the issue has served as a model to the nation on how to respect all of our citizens while respecting the rule of law at the same time.”
“Our next President may be called upon to make more than one Supreme Court nomination, and Governor Romney is committed to nominating judges who take their oath of office seriously and respect the rule of law in our nation. I also support Governor Romney because of his character, his integrity and his stands on the major issues facing the United States.” - Judge Robert Bork
He’s gotten the endorsement of Jaw Sekulow and Robert Bork.
He’s made it clear he opposes judicial activism.
And his ‘faith in America’ speech expressed a very non-ACLU view of the positive role of religious faith and expression in public society.
“I’m a Duncan Hunter fan, but I can accept Romney’s conversion ... most folks have some point of reason which awakened their heart and mind to the dehumanization of the alive unborn. His vocalizations on the abortion issue is not the best reason to reject his rino-ness”
Wow. My estimation of your fair-mindedness just shot up quite a bit.
Yup, when the Mass Supremes said that the legislature must come up with a solution to same-sex marriage, Mr Romney immediately sent a letter to the town clerks in Massachusetts saying that they MUST issue same-sex licenses or lose their jobs, then covered his actions by proposing an amendment to the constitution that never came to a vote. Someone in the state got authorized to change the application form to read Party A and Party B.
His record on judicial activism is a matter of history.
But your comment did not address the issue I brought up, separation of church and state, which the Faith in America speech did not directly address.
I looked up Bork’s view of RKBA, and it is in line with Romney’s- Judge Robert Bork thinks that the second amendment allows a citizen to join a state-run militia, and does not give a citizen the right to keep and bear arms.
So in that light his endorsement makes sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.