Replies

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/03/its_too_secret_.html

(Excerpt): AT&T told an appeals court in a written brief Monday that the case against it for allegedly helping the government spy on its customers should be thrown out, because it cannot defend itself -- even by showing a signed order from the government -- without endangering national security.

A government brief filed simultaneously backed AT&T's claims and said a lower court judge had exceeded his authority by not dismissing the suit outright.

Because plaintiffs' entire action rests upon alleged secret espionage activities, including an alleged secret espionage relationship between AT&T and the Government concerning the alleged activities, this suit must be dismissed now as a matter of law," the government argued in its brief (.pdf).

The telecom giant and the government are appealing a June ruling in a federal district court that allowed the suit brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation against the telecom to proceed, despite the government's invocation of a powerful tool called the "states secrets privilege," which allows it to have civil cases dismissed when national secrets are involved.

Links to the government and AT&T briefs at the above link, as well as a lot more analysis.

Basically, AT&T saying they can't tell people whether or not they gave the government information about them without them harming national security, and the government backing them.

Now that I'm an AT&T customer (not by choice), it wouldn't bother me if AT&T said "yeah, we have the NSA full access to our network, and this is why and what they are doing", but all of this crap about "we can't tell you" is a bunch of crap - everybody knows AT&T was/is helping the NSA, so they've scared off any potential criminal/terrorists.