To: magslinger
I think it would be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law that the cat was unwilling.
Typically, testimony from cats is rather ambiguous.
To: proxy_user
Typically, testimony from cats is rather ambiguous Cat got your tongue?
40 posted on
02/22/2007 5:53:08 AM PST by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: proxy_user
I think it would be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law that the cat was unwilling. On the contrary, I think there would be plenty of physical evidence, in the form of long, parallel bloody lines.
54 posted on
02/22/2007 8:56:19 AM PST by
LexBaird
(98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
To: proxy_user
I think it would be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law that the cat was unwilling. Typically, testimony from cats is rather ambiguous.Maybe not. When the defense attorney puts the cat on the witness stand, with a paper bag on the seat next to it, and the cat promptly crawls into the bag (as cats usually do with paper bags), the jury is likely to understand the cat's testimony quite clearly. If I was the defense attorney, I'd hide a little catnip in the bag just to be on the safe side.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson