To: Central Scrutiniser
That is a statement of arrogance. To deny the fact that most of true science discoveries were made by men and women who believe in God as the creator (not intelligent design).
It was meant to belittle those who believe in God as the Creator, because you do not wish to believe yourself.
You also do not accept that Satan exists and is the father of all lies.
Creationist believe in true science, that is science of testable things.
Your religion of evolution has no testable parts that prove your belief, it is all faith based (adaptation and variation are not evolution). Mutations have been proved not to be a mechanism of evolution, natural selection has been proved not to be a mechanism. Chemical evolution has been proved wrong.
All the hypothesis's have been proved wrong, so they sit and wait as new hypothesis's are made up and then worship it at the local museum.
Darwin relied on the future to find evidence of his demented brainchild, and to the dismay of the future they can not find hard evidence. They can only make evidence appear to fit the theory, not make the theory validated by the evidence.
84 posted on
02/23/2007 8:42:29 AM PST by
Creationist
( Evolution=alternative to believing in God to justify their moral shortfalls and animal behavior)
To: Creationist
85 posted on
02/23/2007 8:44:59 AM PST by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Creationist
> It was meant to belittle those who believe in God as the
> Creator, because you do not wish to believe yourself.
Long before evolution was proposed, most geologists (who had begun work uniformly believing the creation myth of Genesis) had come to the conclusion that the earth was much, much older than could be accounted for by a literal biblical chronology.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson