Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rob Bishop
Like he said, the field for Democrats hasn't been this good in decades.

Ironically, the consensus top two candidates are the two weakest general election candidates. Richardson, Edwards, Gore (if he decides to run) would all be harder to beat in the general election than either Hillary or Obama.

16 posted on 02/26/2007 8:21:27 AM PST by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: CommerceComet

Agree 100% although I think that Richardson and Edwards are not easier to beat than Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama, but Gore is for sure the toughest one to beat if he runs of course.


19 posted on 02/26/2007 8:35:35 AM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: CommerceComet
Ironically, the consensus top two candidates are the two weakest general election candidates. Richardson, Edwards, Gore (if he decides to run) would all be harder to beat in the general election than either Hillary or Obama. What I meant was the field is so strong because both parties are running democrats.
31 posted on 02/26/2007 10:37:43 AM PST by Rob Bishop (Revereradio.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson