You might want to take it up with whomever posted those articles.
Not picking on you per se.. just pointing out the "rush to post something" is'nt allways in the best interest of FR.
It's actually not the first time someone has tried to use DNA testing to prove Christ was who he said he was. There was some guy several years ago, and I can't remember his name, but he said he found the place where Christ was actually hung on the cross and found a piece of the cross that had blood on it. He tested the blood and it had half of the normal chromosomes, so he said that proved Christ was who he said he was. They are all nuts.