[YCTHouston]

I've pretty much given up on wikipedia. It's a fun idea to go in and collaborate on the historical record, but the editors with authority will simply overwrite anything that doesn't jive with their left-wing gay agenda. Waste of time.

[lqclamar]

the editors with authority will simply overwrite anything that doesn't jive with their left-wing gay agenda

Very left wing. And very gay. It's probably not a far cry to say that around 35-40% of wikipedia's ADMINISTRATORS are homosexuals or other sex perverts. The percentage is even higher in the upper levels of wikipedia's heirarchy. But should we expect anything different from a site that was founded by a well known internet pornographer who also tried to cover up his porno business when wikipedia became popular?

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,69880-0.html

[Arkinsaw]

You are correct to give up on Wikipedia. Its hopeless. I gave up after fighting with someone who was trying to put something anti-Iraq war in about everything. In this case...J. William Fulbright would have been opposed to the Iraq War. As if the guy could channel the ghost of J. William Fulbright and get his spin on George Bush from beyond the grave. I got no help.

Any encyclopedia that can't get a consensus that someone who has been dead for years cannot comment on a current event.....needs giving up on.