You started in with the overheated "war" rhetoric. What do you think happens in a war?
I'm talking about calling a spade a spade.
Unless you know something about Edwards that I don't, Coulter was doing nothing of the kind. She was engaging in schoolyard taunts, and anyone who considers that an appropriate tactic when discussing important issues is someone who shouldn't be taken seriously.
Second, I don't want "bring people to my side" by tip-toeing through the PC mine-field of nonsense.
When did it become "PC" to aver that some words should not be used in polite company? Free Republic is hardly ground zero for political correctness, but I'm more careful to avoid profanity here than on just about any other online forum I post to. Because this community, like any, has standards, and breaching them is rude.
The only people I see that you bring "to your side" by not using the word faggots, is PC sensitive weaklings.
A great many Americans see "faggot" in the same light as a racial epithet. I almost typed in a Lenny Brice-style litany of those, but decided against it. A fair number of people, even people who don't like homosexuals (or John Edwards for that matter), or who don't care much one way or the other, are likely to be put off by someone who makes mean-spirited comments, and by people who applaud them.
Take Coulter;s remark word for word, but substitute "n----r" and Barack Obama, or "s--c" and Bill Richardson, or "w-p" and Rudy Guiliani, or "k--e " and Joe Lieberman, or "k---t" and Arnold Schwarzenegger, so on and so forth. Would those comments have been acceptable? Would vocal disapproval have been "PC run amok?"
There are so many people who have given up on the political system, because no-body wants to truely take a stand and lead. It reminds of Braveheart where Wallace is imploring the leader to just lead. Ann is leading, maybe with her head, but at least she calls it as she sees it.
Leaders point out problems and advocate solutions. Playground taunts are not leadership.