Posted on 03/05/2007 5:19:11 AM PST by SJackson
Judge rules public schools have right to teach charges whatever they deem appropriate — parents and morality be damned
Whatever else might be said about it, US District Judge Mark Wolf's decision in Parker v. Hurley is a model of clear English prose.
"The constitutional right of parents to raise their children does not include the right to restrict what a public school may teach their children," Wolf unambiguously wrote in dismissing a suit by two Lexington, Mass. couples who objected to lessons the local elementary school was teaching their children. "Under the Constitution public schools are entitled to teach anything that is reasonably related to the goals of preparing students to become engaged and productive citizens in our democracy."
Entitled to teach anything. That means, the judge ruled, that parents have no authority to veto elements of a public-school curriculum they dislike. They have no right to be notified before those elements are presented in class. And the Constitution does not entitle them to opt their children out of such classes when the subject comes up.
As Wolf's straightforward language makes plain, it doesn't much matter what that subject might be. The parents in the Lexington case objected to "diversity" instruction that presented same-sex marriage and homosexual attraction as unobjectionable. That message, the judge noted, contradicted the parents' "sincerely held religious beliefs that homosexuality is immoral and that marriage is necessarily . . . between a man and a woman."
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
Amen, "wintertime!"
I pray you are blessed with many beautiful children.
The Constitution never contemplated Sex-Ed (or any other liberal catechismal tenet) and all the penumbrae and tortisms in the universe will not make it so. Give me 10,000 well armed terrorists than one federal judge with an agenda.
Bingo!!!
A letter writing campaign reminding this judge of that particular fact would be a good thing...
If that makes him mad...Oh well...He'll have to get over it...
I'd call his office as well...I'm sure his staff would love to hear from us taxpayers...
And I don't live in the state, go figure that one?!?!? hehehe
Ann did...She seems to be taking the heat well...
Good for her!
I agree, wintertime...but as that hasn't happened "long ago" this would seem to be the final straw for any reasonable parent. When schools become nothing but an indoctrination tool then they have no value...except to those who control the content....and they shouldn't really want it either, but liberals are hypocrites to the core...they wouldn't be quite if hard core conservative principles were being indoctrinated into their children.
Here's some more info on the particulars...
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/02/federal-judge-dismisses-lawsuit-over.php
Lots of tags and links...
I already had a conversation with a friend on mine who is a county civil court judge, and she already sees that appeal sprouting some big legs...We agreed there is not much she can do to help, but she's grateful to know of this...And she'll be following it very closely...
Its a sick hobby of ours...;-)
The judge is also a lurker here, so she's watching the commentary, and very much enjoying the pithy points being made...
You guys and gals are dead right on al of this...
Don't let up on any pressure you feel compelled to communicate either with this judge and his office...
He dug this hole himself...
California k-12 schools are producing a product that ranks near the bottom of a nation that stands in the lower third of the industrialized world. It is also one of the most expensive systems in the world, now costing over $11,000 per child per year (State, Federal, and local funds included). Under Gray Davis, education spending per student has increased nearly 30%, while classroom performance remains relatively unimproved. The system is broken and the State is nearly bankrupt. So what can we do?
Here is what Republicans have already done. They sponsored Proposition 227, mandating English only instruction. Immigrants supported it, while liberal Democrats and the teachers' unions (who make higher salaries for bilingual instruction) fought it to their last dime. Ending bilingual education was of immediate help to immigrant children, giving them a real opportunity to strive for the American Dream (some test scores in Orange County rose 27% the first year).
Republicans supported Proposition 209, banning racial preferences. So Democrats ignore the law and STILL cling to affirmative action, which discriminates against many students of immigrant origin while they are still working to undermine the ban on bilingual education!
Why conservatives don't emphasize these distinctions to immigrant families who otherwise vote Democratic, is mystifying.
On the other hand, union-dominated Democrats foisted Proposition 8, mandating class-size-reduction. The law not only hugely increased costs without significantly improving test scores, it seriously harmed children in inner-city school districts. Their best teachers left to pursue new openings at successful suburban schools.
So who really cares about the future performance of our children: liberal Democrats who build a welfare state beholden to the teachers' unions, or conservatives who need competitive and productive employees in a free market?
So what more do conservatives propose to do from here?
First, we must break up large, unified school districts. The supposed purpose of consolidation was to reduce the cost of overhead and to strengthen the districts’ collective bargaining power, but that isn’t how it has turned out. Instead, district bureaucracies have become enormous and the resulting issues are so complex that taxpayers and parents are pushed aside by an organizational machine controlled by those receiving the funds. This trend has effectively excluded parents from public school decision-making.
The governor could assist formation of corporate service associations for school districts so that they can select specific services from the State in return for divesting academic operations into smaller institutions. Smaller school districts will give parents a stronger voice on district boards. The principal barrier to making this possible is to develop programs for children with special needs. Here is where we can turn to parents for solutions.
"Professional educators" often assert that parents on local School Boards aren’t qualified to make many administrative decisions, especially over programs for children with special needs. So, let's look at an education success-story that not only proves the argument wrong, it points toward a total transformation in public education.
Home education is enjoying a renaissance in America, and religious freedom isn’t the reason. Parents are choosing to home school to assure a better education for their children, whose learning habits they know best. A family bond of patience and discipline is a critical factor in student success, especially in a challenging situation. What many people don't know about home-schools is that they have a high percentage of students with genetic, behavioral, and developmental disabilities that had often been poorly served by public institutions. Even with that statistical disadvantage, SAT, ACT, and STAR test scores strongly indicate that home education is producing superior results across the entire spectrum of individual ability.
So parents ARE competent to make choices about their children’s education, and home schools successfully manage nearly every type of specialized educational problem. So what are they doing right that we can apply to public institutions?
As home-educators have grown in number, they have been organizing into loosely knit education cooperatives that point to a new form of public education: decentralized, customer-oriented learning networks, using customized products designed to meet individual interests and abilities. That promises what 21st Century education could become: a multi-disciplinary market of customized learning services.
We are already starting to see this transformation. Software and curriculum companies are finding a growing market of home school customers committed to gaining competitive advantages. Colleges and univer¬sities are offering online degrees because they need superior students to assure productive graduates. Superior teachers could get rich transmitting their ideas and methods to a mass-market over the Internet. Where better to develop those products and sell them to the world than California?
So how can home education benefit children in public schools?
The State can use private and home-education markets as if each school was an R&D laboratory developing and testing learning tools and services. Parents on public school boards could select from among a range of guaranteed products that the State would fund for those public schools participating in the divestiture program. Insurance on the guarantee would cover the cost of remedial education if the product fails to meet warranted performance. It is a gradual transformation, from experimenting on our children with untested academic theories, to contracting for innovative tools and methods that have been proven in the marketplace.
Of course, any company offering such a guarantee would demand control over how it is delivered. Most would have to rely upon their own employees trained in the methods they offer, else they could not be forced to warrant their product…
It's a way of privatizing the schools from within, subject by subject, contract by contract, by individual child with special needs if need be.
So what do we do when the union howls? Crush that union, in the name of restoring the integrity of the profession it fails to represent. It richly deserves it, and not a few teachers agree. The key to do doing it, is to cut off the money. First, we must free California’s teachers from being forced, illegally, to support the radical political agenda of national unions. A conservative Governor of California will enforce the U.S. Supreme Court decision, Communications Workers v. Beck, that prohibits unions from requiring campaign contributions in union dues without teacher’s permission. Second, teachers' unions have also been illegally using funds for political partisanship, which is specifically exempted from their tax-exempt status. A conservative attorney general would prosecute union officials for tax fraud and demand back taxes from the union treasury.
Any rational person should commend many of California's hard-working teachers for their often heroic commitment to educate future generations, under what can be dangerous and frustrating working conditions. Merit pay for such outstanding teachers is only fair. Sole-bargaining provisions or programs usurp the ability of locally-elected school board members to recognizing these outstanding teachers.
We must also attract individuals from outside the teaching profession who have the technical skills in subjects which many "professional educators" are demonstrably incompetent: particularly math and science. The private system mentioned above is an ideal means.
Finally, we must address those who have been mistreated by the system, and abused even more by affirmative action. Top graduates of inner city schools are most often not ready for university level work. To enroll them at the University of California is unjust to them and to the rest of the students who have to accommodate them. The fix is to offer students with high grades from bad schools and mediocre SATs a free, two-year, junior college education to prepare them for high level work. Then let them enroll at UC having lost only a year (net). It's the best that can be done to redress a fundamental injustice, but we must have a place where credentials are colorblind and that is at the doors of the university.
Federal education dollars aren’t worth the price of Federal controls. Private and home education both leave the State with more money to spend per-child and provide a competitive reason for public schools to keep their customers. All we have to do is keep government from regulating new educational methods out of existence and California can rise from the ashes of a broken system and lead the way once again, into a world of exciting possibilities for your children.
Education Policy Components
Not if I can help it.
There is a big push to make our laws "conform" to an international standard.
That's true of all our laws.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Remember the whole point of government schools is to indoctrinate the next generation.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
For the parent the goal is free babysitting.
I know personally teachers who do effective damage control on the product of prior generations of the system. They're good people trying to make the best of a bad situation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.