Posted on 03/05/2007 7:30:35 AM PST by FLOutdoorsman
If it were built, the road would be one of the engineering wonders of the 21st century -a trade route a quarter of a mile wide, carving a path from Mexico through the heart of America to Canada.
In its most radical form, it would allow lorry drivers to travel hundreds of miles from the Mexican border deep into the US before reaching customs and immigration controls in Kansas.
Backers of the idea, labelled the "Nafta Superhighway", after the North American trade pact, say it would revolutionise patterns of commerce across the continent and enhance the economic prospects of millions. But its critics say it could spell the end of US sovereignty. In arguments akin to those deployed by critics of the European Union, opponents say that opening borders will hit businesses, create a terrorist threat and allow illegal immigrants and drugs to flood in.
Opposition is strongest in Texas, where the state's plans for a vast road project, known as the Trans-Texas Corridor, are well advanced. Once complete, the corridor could become the first leg of a Nafta Superhighway, crossing the Mexican border at the Rio Grande, near Laredo, and then pushing north to Kansas. It would include a toll road with 10 lorry and car lanes, a high-speed railway, and oil, gas and water pipelines.
With costs estimated at $183 billion (£94 billion), the 1,200 ft wide road would consume one million acres in Texas alone. Construction could take up to 50 years.
Many of those fighting the project are conservative farmers who would normally be supporters of President George W Bush but who are suspicious of his support for more free trade. At a meeting in the Texas town of Temple last week, more than 100 people gathered to hear news from Corridor Watch, a group fighting the road.
At a community hall built by Slovak immigrants nearly a century ago, many of the men wore cowboy hats, while their wives arrived with casseroles to sustain the gathering. Despite bowing heads for the Pledge of Allegiance, the meeting expressed anger at what the road would mean.
Hank Gilbert, a rancher, said: "At the Battle of the Alamo people came from all over the US to fight for our sovereignty. Now we are giving it away to the very people we fought." Like many protesters, he believes the link will make it easier for cheap goods to flood into the US. "Farmers fear that this kind of globalisation will put them out of business," he said.
In Texas, the superhighway would be so wide that critics say it would be too expensive to construct overpasses except in the cities, severing tight-knit rural communities.
The superhighway is being promoted by a pressure group, the North America's Supercorridor Coalition, which includes business leaders, trade groups and government officials from Canada, Mexico and the US.
However, officials of the federal government in Washington deny that there is any transnational plan. A member of the Department of Transport told a congressional committee this month that all the government wanted to was improve existing roads.
Many conservatives disagree. They link the highway to agreements being negotiated behind closed doors between the Mexican, American and Canadian governments that they believe will transform the North American Free Trade Association into an EU-style superstate. They point to an agreement signed by Mr Bush, Vicente Fox, then president of Mexico, and Paul Martin, then Canada's prime minister, in Waco, Texas, in March 2005.
The Security and Prosperity Partnership is intended to promote co-operation on security and boost economic opportunities. But it set alarm bells ringing on the Right because it formed working parties that fall outside the control of Congress.
Republican Ron Paul, a Texas congressman, says it is part of a drive for "an integrated North American Union" - complete with a currency, a cross-national bureaucracy and borderless travel. "It would represent another step toward the abolition of national sovereignty," he said.
"But its critics say it could spell the end of US sovereignty. In arguments akin to those deployed by critics of the European Union, opponents say that opening borders will hit businesses, create a terrorist threat and allow illegal immigrants and drugs to flood in."
-----
Ya Think??
Watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXrHoT4sRk8
Trade unification leads to political and judicial unification. Does anyone want to try hammering out a consensus with the Mexican mob?
What a dumbass this reporter is. The corridors will be going around cities not through them.
Our sovereignty is being siphoned off all around. Through our ports, across our borders, by way of outsourcing of industry......
What a dumbass this reporter is. The corridors will be going around cities not through them.
-----
The real issue is that it is an WIDE OPEN CORRIDOR for anything and everything into the USA -- customs in Kansas?? Hello? What happened to the border -- poof!!!
If they can go all the way to KC without clearing customs & immigration then there should be no exit ramps before then !
I already fear it, ESPN had the Busch race yesterday in Mexican. I had to go to the deuce to hear it in American.
Maybe the governments virtual fence work.
Forget about asking these guys to build a wall - they are planning to build an all-admissions pass straight through the middle of America. This is a security and sovereignty nightmare of epic proportions. They want to expand free-trade? Great! Take all that orange crap and pile it up AT THE BORDER WHERE IT BELONGS. Not even Rome was this irresponsible, this heedless, this oblivious.
I'm not so sure he's wrong about the 'severing of tight-knit rural communities.'
There are some folks on I-35 who don't want to sell their land. I can see how a person who lives in a rural setting might not care for the prospect of traffic noise and unsightliness.
"Republican Ron Paul, a Texas congressman, says it is part of a drive for "an integrated North American Union" - complete with a currency, a cross-national bureaucracy and borderless travel. "It would represent another step toward the abolition of national sovereignty," he said."
Yeah, but y'all know what a liar Ron Paul is. Practically every word out of his mouth is false.
/sarc
Wow,
I'll be able to get on that road and cruise all the way up to Winnipeg. Wonder what max speed limit will be?
It's always a bad sign when they survey through your living room.
A few years back when they were talking about a bypass branch though this part of Michigan. Their own studies showed that they would have to remove "only" 300 families.
Wow
One of the reasons I like mountain farming. I get jealous of flat land every once and a while, but then I think, who will ever want a road through here?
ping
Look folks.....there are those that want the border to disappear. This means making Mexico part of the US.....eventually. It's already in the works. But...you can't do this until the economics in Mexico are on par with the U.S. The only way this can happen is to lower our economics and raise theirs at the same time. When that happens, the border will become transparent. Clinton was part of an organization that wants to help feed the world. Instead of using our farmers to help with this, he set Mexican farmers up to do this to help build up their economics. It's coming people.....just watch. Your grandkids may be part of a new world order.
Within 5 years, ALL of Mexico will be living here. The word is out. Go to Americas and take whatever you want. The American will not stop you. If they do say anything to you, then call them racist. They will then run home with their tail between their legs. Americans will not fight for their country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.