Posted on 03/06/2007 5:28:51 PM PST by markomalley
— Frances Kissling, go-to gal for media quotes about all things Catholic, has stepped down as head of Catholics for a Free Choice. Religion reporting just got a whole lot harder.
Catholics for a Free Choice is a Catholic group of abortion activists’ dreams. If you hit the CFFC Web site, you’ll read: “Ask Pope Benedict to Lift the Ban on Condoms!” And in a closing salvo in the group’s magazine, “Conscience,” Kissling asks, “Is abortion a morally neutral act? Is it, as some have said, an unambiguous moral good?” Usually a group with the word “Catholic” in its name would be clear on those kinds of questions.
But Catholics for a Free Choice is not a Catholic group; it’s a “Catholic” group, one whose Catholic identity doesn’t go much deeper than the name on its letterhead. In reality, it’s something much closer to a liberal-Democratic group — who it comes closest to speaking for — than anything else.
As the U.S. Catholic bishops’ conference has pointed out, CFFC’s claims to be Catholic are bogus. In a 2000 statement — not the first — they declared: “A group calling itself Catholics for a Free Choice (CFFC) has been publicly supporting abortion while claiming it speaks as an authentic Catholic voice. That claim is false. In fact, the group’s activity is directed to rejection and distortion of Catholic teaching about the respect and protection due to defenseless unborn human life ... (CFFC) is an arm of the abortion lobby in the United States and throughout the world.”
But Catholics for a Free Choice is not a Catholic group; it’s a “Catholic” group, one whose Catholic identity doesn’t go much deeper than the name on its letterhead. In reality, it’s something much closer to a liberal-Democratic group — who it comes closest to speaking for — than anything else.
As the U.S. Catholic bishops’ conference has pointed out, CFFC’s claims to be Catholic are bogus. In a 2000 statement — not the first — they declared: “A group calling itself Catholics for a Free Choice (CFFC) has been publicly supporting abortion while claiming it speaks as an authentic Catholic voice. That claim is false. In fact, the group’s activity is directed to rejection and distortion of Catholic teaching about the respect and protection due to defenseless unborn human life ... (CFFC) is an arm of the abortion lobby in the United States and throughout the world.”
But that chicanery seems to work as a “Catholic” source for many a reporter anyway.
You could feel the pain, in fact, on the pages of The New York Times when Kissling stepped down in February. A headline described her as “Backing Abortion Rights While Keeping the Faith.” The same story quoted her saying, “I’m so Catholic, I can’t get away from it.” Underlining the point that conservatives are terribly judgmental (the fools believe in right and wrong), the Times reporter described Kissling as “one of the most vocal of the so-called bad Catholics, those who manage to accommodate the opposing sentiments of love for the church and anger at much of its doctrine.”
Kissling’s retirement marks an opportunity for The New York Times to report on some other Catholics - maybe even Catholics who actually believe what the Church teaches to take to the media.
In her exit interview, Kissling complained to the “Times” about the Church hierarchy: “It abuses nuns, anyone who thinks, homosexuals, women who have abortions. It sexually abuses children. It treats people badly, and something has to be done to change its abusive nature.”
Yes, the Catholic Church has its share of sinners and corruption. But giving further evidence that Kissling’s been right in line with the Democrats, her diatribe sounded a lot like the anti-Catholic rantings of a blogger recently hired and allowed to resign by the John Edwards presidential campaign. Describing the pope as a “dictator,” the blogger said that the Catholic doctrine of limbo is “wielded by everyday Catholics to explain where the souls of unborn babies go, which is just an extra way to guilt trip women who have abortions.”
Perhaps now that Kissling has time on her hands, she can do some freelancing for Edwards?
The media have been inadvertently helpful to the Catholic Church over the years. Their relentless investigation earlier this decade uncovered abuse. In the wake of the scandals, John Paul II biographer George Weigel thanked reporters at the likes of the Boston Globe for what they did: “If God could work through the Assyrians in the Old Testament, God can certainly work through The New York Times and the Boston Globe today, whether the Times or the Globe realizes what’s happening or not. ... The trauma of the Catholic Church in the United States in 2002 will become an opportunity to deepen and extend the reforms of Vatican II if the Church becomes more Catholic, not less — if the Church rediscovers the courage to be Catholic.”
Catholics — those who truly have the courage to stand athwart a secular culture of death yelling stop — should find their best and brightest clear-talking believers, and get them into the Blackberry address books of reporters and bookers and bloggers. The “Catholic” voices ought to be Catholic. That’s how you get out the Good News.
Finally something said that needed to be said!
Catholic (non-CINO) ping for your lists!
Reporters already know the stance of solid Catholic teaching and prefer to publish 'opposing' views, which garner them more readers. Frances Kissling and her ilk are rapidly aging with few, if any, replacements. Eventually, the mainstream media will be left with no options other than to report the 'truth' of Catholic teaching .. or nothing at all.
As our parish priest says, "the Age of Aquarius can't last forever."
I myself am probably the world's worst Catholic in terms of personal piety...
I'm not a Catholic, but I do send my daughter to Catholic school and they have a pretty simple method for determining who is an active Catholic and who isn't. If you are registered with their parish, have a record of regular attendance at mass as determined by collections envelopes, have filled out a sacrificial giving card and have a record of participation in parish activities, then for purposes of school admission you qualify as a Catholic and can receive reduced tuition. I would be interested in seeing how many of these Catholics For a Free Choice would qualify. Not many I bet.
** I would be interested in seeing how many of these Catholics For a Free Choice would qualify. Not many I bet**
I'm not going to take you up on that bet, because I think you are probably very correct in your assertions.
Man oh man, this drives me crazy!
I have a friend who tells everyone she is a Catholic BUT:
- she believes in "a woman's right to choose"
- she believes that birth control is a responsible decision if it's not convenient to have children, because abstinence is too much to ask
- she believes that you never have to go to Mass, as long as you "feel spiritual"
- she believes that it's better for her son's girlfriend to spend the night with him at his house, because then she can make sure they both get to school on time in the morning
- she believes that the Eucharist is only a symbol
- she believes that you can do anything you want, as long as you are "a nice person"
- she thinks that the Pope is behind the times and needs to be more "progressive"
Well, I don't know what religion she is, but it certainly does not appear to be Catholic!
I run into coutless others who say they are Catholic BUT...
I have yet to run into a Presbyterian BUT or a Methodist BUT or an Orthodox Jew BUT.
Maybe they should peel off and form their own "religion." We can have Roman Catholics and Catholic BUTs.
Sheesh - I guess you hit a hot button with me!
She's going to hit a bump in the road when she has to prove her Catholic status to God. This woman's soul is in grave danger as a professed Catholic.
So many Judases, so little time.
Often at Sunday Masses, when I am not praying or is looking for my one of my prayer books, I would glance to see the long commuion lines, and I would wonder truly, how MANY recieve, but how MANY truly believe?
...Or take into consideration, that the younger folks are seeking true spiritual faith and will not be afraid to mean what they say. My parish has a early 40's priest as head pastor for a little over a month and I have noticed that there are more teenagers and young adults going to the 10:30 am Sunday mass. This gives me hope for the future.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.