Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Can't Win the General Election
The Sierra Times ^ | 03/07/2007 | John Bender

Posted on 03/07/2007 4:32:54 AM PST by Verax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-307 next last
To: Ditter

Politics is the 'art of the compromise', you haven't figured that out yet.

I have figured that out. You seem to think that compromise means total surrender. People won't compromise with someone that they know will cave as soon as negotiations begin.


281 posted on 03/09/2007 7:18:39 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter: pro-life, pro-2nd Amendment, pro-border control, pro-family)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
We are going to have to agree to disagree. I am going try to back a winner. A winner with as many of my principles as possible.

You, on the other hand, can stand in the back holding *all* of your principles clutched tightly in your fist. You can feel good about yourself, that you didn't 'give in' and vote for some lesser candidate. I just hope that your actions and others like you don't put hillary in the WH, because that would be a tragedy for all of us.
282 posted on 03/09/2007 7:29:33 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
In NC, the locals would probably make Giuliani their second or third choice among Republicans. However, if he is the Republican nominee, and Hillary is the Democrat one, Rudy will carry the state by a margin of at least 10%.

John / Billybob
283 posted on 03/09/2007 7:55:10 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (Please get involved: www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Makes sense.


284 posted on 03/09/2007 8:08:39 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (So many geeks, so few circuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Texas Patriot

Well, while you try and find a Reagan-type candidate to support I will be supporting the candidade that can beat Hilldabeast. Best of luck.


285 posted on 03/09/2007 8:46:05 AM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Dstorm

The president is not going to be able to grab your guns, and especially not if you elect a republican Congress. I don't know what brain disconnect would possess conservatives to elect a left wing democrat president and Congress. And that is what they started last election, that is what they will accomplish next election.


286 posted on 03/09/2007 8:48:12 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

So you really don't care WHO wins as long as it's a Republican. Is that your position?


287 posted on 03/09/2007 8:52:36 AM PST by Verax ("Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated - Planned Parenthood President,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Verax
Help vanquish Rudy McRomney...



Freepmail me to join the Duncan Hunter Pinglist

Freepmail seanmerc to join the Veterans for Hunter Pinglist

Contribute to Duncan Hunter's Presidential Campaign -- http://www.gohunter08.com
288 posted on 03/09/2007 8:54:50 AM PST by Antoninus (I don't vote for liberals, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verax
Of course I care who gets elected President. As my column makes clear, however, if it winds up as Rudy versus Hillary, I have no hesitancy in that circumstance of voting for Rudy.

John / Billybob
289 posted on 03/09/2007 9:04:44 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (Please get involved: www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Dstorm

"I say it will be your fault for putting forth a candidate who we can't vote for, who's right? -- therefore it is a poor argument on your part."

Except that I'm not "putting forth a candidate." I'm voting for the person who I think has the optimal combination of right ideas and electability. Very seldom in our history have those two characteristics come together into one candidate. I can only think of Reagan and possibly Bush.

I guess the answer to your question boils down to how much difference one sees between the Dem and GOP candidate. Some claim here that they see little or no difference. But what I've tried to argue that I see far less difference between what America would look like under Reagan and under Giuliani than the gap I see between Reagan and H. Clinton.


290 posted on 03/09/2007 9:21:57 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

yeh yeh yeh!!! Hunter(a good guy) or Ron Paul or a Newt have as much chance winning a general election as I do. I always felt I had the luxury to be a purist and even abstain from voting if a candidate didn't meet my criteria. Watching the new congress of barely 2 months has snapped me into reality. We can ill afford to put our national security into the hands of a democrat or a fortress America type. I'll even hold my nose and vote for McCain who I viscerally dislike because I fear a dem. If Rudy's polls hold up I'll vote for him because he's good on the most pressing issues of our time, those being homeland security winning the wot crime and taxes.


291 posted on 03/09/2007 9:44:20 AM PST by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Verax

Thanks for posting this. Its 100 percent correct.

The Repubs were a minority party UNTIL the social conservaties came along in 1980 and made them a majority party.

Nominate Gulliani and Joe Sixpack - who votes Repub because of social issues - will stay home or vote Democrat.

The internet represents a skewed reality. Its full of articulate Social liberals/Economic Conservatives. These voters represent probably 5% of the voting population. The other group Social Conservatives/Economic Liberals represent probably 15-20% of the population.

We need to go hunting where the ducks are. Go the Dole/Ford/Bush'92 route and we are doomed to defeat in 2008.

To misquote Lincoln: God must love Reagan Democrats because he made so many of them.


292 posted on 03/09/2007 10:07:39 AM PST by pablo H (Remember '96- No more Doles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Great column, CBB. I found the attacks on you for daring to write this objective analysis to be hilarious.

This column reminds me of this one:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/939395/posts

That analysis turned out to be deadly accurate.

Rudy is quite simply the only popular Republican in the country, the only candidate with strong support in every region, the only candidate who appeals to members of both parties and independents, and the one with the most name recognition (except for Bill's WINO).

In addition, Republican candidates who lead early get the nomination -- unlike on the 'rat side. Unless Rudy screws it up, which I don't expect, he'll get the nomination.

Rudy also is helped by the fact that the other three main candidates have obvious flaws, and the rest are a bunch of mini-mees. Particularly amusing are the members of the "Jaeger Battalion" -- who are no doubt passionate in their support but lack the numbers to have a realistic shot at victory.

I see the SC Primary as key. Rudy has a strong organization down there, and his selection to speak to graduates of The Citadel is IMHO hugh and series! That indicated support from the movers and shakers of the Palmetto State. If Rudy wins SC, I don't see how anyone could stop him from the nomination.

If it is Rudy v. Hillary that will be the biggest NY battle since Ali-Frazier I.


293 posted on 03/09/2007 11:58:26 AM PST by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

oops, replied to the wrong thread!


294 posted on 03/09/2007 11:59:30 AM PST by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: Williams
"I don't agree with his liberal side either, but he has promised to appoint Conservative judges."

Campaign promises and actions based on beliefs are two different things.


295 posted on 03/09/2007 12:01:08 PM PST by flashbunny (<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Ok, I'm convinced. I will stay home and elect a left wing liberal traitor democrat. Not.


296 posted on 03/09/2007 12:09:54 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Williams

"Ok, I'm convinced. I will stay home and elect a left wing liberal traitor democrat. Not."

Ah, the "logic" of a rudy supporter.

How about: Support someone other than a pro-war liberal for the GOP nomination and THEN vote for that person?


297 posted on 03/09/2007 12:11:43 PM PST by flashbunny (<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Verax
Giuliani Can't Win the General Election

..it would be a real test of the adage "we do not beat them by being like them".

Giving the country a clear choice rather than 1 or 2 degrees of difference, IMO, will give the GOP a better chance at victory in the general.

But we are WAY ahead of things here--the mayor has a monumental task of convincing the Religious Right, Gun Owners etc that he is the guy...

298 posted on 03/09/2007 12:17:53 PM PST by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
I am not even remotely a Rudy supporter. All these discussions are on the assumption that he gets the nomination. If I had to pull the lever in a primary right now I lean toward Romney.

In the general election I will vote for any of the various republican nominees. There is only one possible exception that comes to mind - Chuck Hagel. But I don't believe he has a remote chance of getting nominated.

299 posted on 03/09/2007 12:20:29 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Verax
There is about 30% of the voting public in each camp who vote for the party no matter what.

I think with Giuliani there will be a problem with this number. The "no matter what" is a little different this time around because in the past the "no matter what" that you ended up voting for was at least a conservative, even if the person wasn't your first choice among the conservative candidates.

In the past we have never had a Republican nominee that was pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro-gun control and pro-amnesty all wrapped up in one. I think this is a completely different ball game.

300 posted on 03/09/2007 12:28:36 PM PST by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-307 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson