Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Addition or subtraction?: Ann Coulter and the conservative crossroads
Townhall.com ^ | March 7, 2007 | Michael Medved

Posted on 03/07/2007 6:28:29 AM PST by MadIvan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-471 last
To: MadIvan

Ivan
When you are in a fight with gutter RATS, you had better learn to fight like them or get the 'shite' kicked out of you every time---quit moaning and selling the 'high road' crap that has been getting conservative Americans kicked around lately--Medved can say what he wants and I will take Ann Coulter who has more guts than most so called men in the Pub Party


461 posted on 03/10/2007 8:07:41 PM PST by cmotormac44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
But I think that it should remain an option for women who want to excersize it.

And I would actually give your side credit for an "honest political debate" if the same option was available to men.

As it stands, America operates under a sexual caste system.

462 posted on 03/10/2007 9:46:22 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
And I would actually give your side credit for an "honest political debate" if the same option was available to men.

Ah -- I'm sorry, I don't understand.

The man probably has a say, but since it's the mother's body that has to go thru the pregnancy then it seems like she has the final word, to me. But I haven't thought that much about it.

What would do you suggest as a better approach?

463 posted on 03/10/2007 10:12:51 PM PST by Dominic Harr (Conservative: The "ant", to a liberal's "grasshopper".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Get off it.

I am sick and tired of conservatites making a big deal out of any comment that might just possibly insult some people -generally people who don't give a rat's @$$ for our political views anyway.

The Dems - for this I give them credit - ALWAYS circle the wagons, defend their own and move on. Which is one reason why they are where they are - implenting their agenda - and we are where we are - quaking in the shadows.

I love Coulter. She is a fighter and goes after the libs tooth and nail and I don't need some self-righteous individual second guessing her and defending Edwards.

Edwards ia a pandering politician just doing what so many of them are so good at - exploiting ANYTHING to try and benefit himself.

Conservatives should get wise and emulate him in this respect.


464 posted on 03/10/2007 10:33:59 PM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
Ah -- I'm sorry, I don't understand. The man probably has a say, but since it's the mother's body that has to go thru the pregnancy then it seems like she has the final word, to me. But I haven't thought that much about it. What would do you suggest as a better approach?

It is fundamentally unjust to expect the man to exercise his reproductive choice before the woman involved is even pregnant when she has nine months to choose after she becomes pregnant.

Her relative discomfort for three or four months is NOTHING compared to the onerous and debilitating obligations enforced against the man in this country by the "choice" of the woman.

If the pro-choice advocates where actually engaging in "honest political debate" rather than gender apartheid, they would have no problem with the "paper abortion."

A paper abortion would be a legal instrument whereby a man, on becoming aware a woman he had sex with was pregnant or within a reasonable amount of time after becoming aware a woman had given birth claiming him as the father, could register a disavowal of parenthood with the local authorities. This would separate him from any obligation for the decision of the woman to reproduce.

If you do a little thinking on the proposition, you will find it is absolutely in conformity with the "stated" pro-choice philosopy, yet I promise you the rhetorical fires of hell if you actually try to advocate it.

465 posted on 03/11/2007 5:19:46 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr

For your reveiw re: Scooter Libby
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1799229/posts
If Thomas Sowell doesn't impress you, no one will.


466 posted on 03/11/2007 5:45:09 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
A paper abortion would be a legal instrument whereby a man, on becoming aware a woman he had sex with was pregnant or within a reasonable amount of time after becoming aware a woman had given birth claiming him as the father, could register a disavowal of parenthood with the local authorities. This would separate him from any obligation for the decision of the woman to reproduce.

I *love* that idea! I've never heard it before.

That's brilliant, the man should have that right, I agree.

I'm not so sure you'd get the resistance you think you would. I'm going to ask around later, and I'll see what kind of response I get.

467 posted on 03/12/2007 7:50:01 AM PDT by Dominic Harr (Conservative: The "ant", to a liberal's "grasshopper".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
For your reveiw re: Scooter Libby

Oh, believe me, I've followed the Libby story closely.

But that works both ways -- Clinton was nailed on the same kind of dynamic, a special prosecutor who went beyond his original case.

It was a political witch-hunt, without a doubt. And I would assume Libby will be pardoned, so the damage to him will be lessened.

468 posted on 03/12/2007 7:58:58 AM PDT by Dominic Harr (Conservative: The "ant", to a liberal's "grasshopper".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
But that works both ways -- Clinton was nailed on the same kind of dynamic, a special prosecutor who went beyond his original case.

Do tell?

I have GOT to hear your reasoning for THAT particular statement.

Will a pardon, which I don't believe is as easy as you do, recoup Libby's financial losses?

469 posted on 03/12/2007 9:55:59 AM PDT by papertyger (Displacement: Attacking those that won't hurt you to compensate for cowardice before those that will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
I have GOT to hear your reasoning for THAT particular statement.

Clinton was nailed by the Whitewater special prosecutor. On an issue that had nothing to do with Whitewater.

:-)

Don't get me wrong, Libby was wronged. But he'll do okay, don't worry. He'll make out in the end, I suspect.

470 posted on 03/12/2007 10:03:15 AM PDT by Dominic Harr (Conservative: The "ant", to a liberal's "grasshopper".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
Clinton was nailed by the Whitewater special prosecutor. On an issue that had nothing to do with Whitewater.

Yeah, cops and robbers are a two way street, also. They both have guns and talk mean to people. (rolling eyes)

471 posted on 03/12/2007 10:57:32 AM PDT by papertyger (Displacement: Attacking those that won't hurt you to compensate for cowardice before those that will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-471 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson