Catholic Newspaper Tells Anti-Abortion Voters Not to Support Giuliani

FoxNews.com ^ | March 7, 2007

[madprof98]

Well, sounds like your (former) pastor and candidate Rudy are two peas in a pod. I can see why you'd be confused about Catholic moral teaching.

[DKNY]

And I can see how a "holier than thou" like you can't discern the difference. So run along and preach to someone else, nothing you have to say interests me.

[madprof98]

I freely admit it's hard for me to tell one adulterer from another adulterer. But you Rudybots have decided your pro-abort cross-dresser is God, so there's no talking with you.

[Antoninus]

Sounds about right to me. No practicing Catholic in their right mind would support Rudy. And almost none that I know will. And I know a lot. And the sad thing is, most of these folks are former Democrats who became Republicans thanks to social issues. But now, they're thinking they might have been duped....

Help vanquish Rudy McRomney...



Freepmail me to join the Duncan Hunter Pinglist

Freepmail seanmerc to join the Veterans for Hunter Pinglist

Contribute to Duncan Hunter's Presidential Campaign -- http://www.gohunter08.com

[madprof98]

most of these folks are former Democrats who became Republicans thanks to social issues. But now, they're thinking they might have been duped....

Listening to one GOP pundit after another telling us we're theocratic one-issue voters with ridiculously outdated concerns--not to mention the PARADE of FReepers spouting the same line--does tend to give some of us second thoughts about the Republican Party all right. I don't mind not voting in the next Presidential election. I just hope the Giuliani GOP is crushed into the dirt so I don't have to wait on some enterprising Reagan-type to reinvent a party in which Christians will be welcome once again.

[NotchJohnson]

Is their a Catholic ping list? Frst of all, Hillary is a bad candidate. Also, how come they get candidates to the left of Mao but we get Rockefeller Republicans? Not really fair.