Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dominic Harr

The coalition is built on the common ground of 'smaller govt, strong on defense, etc'.

Yes and nearly all Soc-cons desire that as well. With Rudy it's one sided. The soc-cons get none of their important issues addressed. To make a coalition work, both sides need to give. Giuliani isn't a coalition candidate. Since there are others who could make everyone happy, supporting Rudy can only be taken as an act against the coalition.


411 posted on 03/08/2007 7:49:02 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter: pro-life, pro-2nd Amendment, pro-border control, pro-family)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]


To: freedomfiter2
The soc-cons get none of their important issues addressed.

The 'important issues' the coalition was built on were the political issues of smaller govt, more local control, strong on defense. Rudy is solid on those issues.

The problem is that the Socials now insist on injecting social issues into coalition. They're changing the contract.

415 posted on 03/08/2007 7:57:20 AM PST by Dominic Harr (Conservative: The "ant", to a liberal's "grasshopper".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies ]

To: freedomfiter2
The intolerant nature of your coalition will be it's undoing.

Not even Reagan could or even tried to stop abortion. The dam broke long ago and there is little any sitting President can do about it, when over 60% of the population now are in favor abortion.
416 posted on 03/08/2007 8:00:54 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson