Vote Yes or No on Rudy

The Brody File ^ | March 8, 2007 | David Brody

[TommyDale]

The National Catholic Register is out with an editorial where they say the following: No deal Rudy. We cannot support you. Here's why:

"Rudy’s deal: He’ll promise not to push the pro-abortion agenda, and he’ll nominate judges in the mold of Samuel Alito and John Roberts. Pro-lifers in the Republican Party in return would support him, but keep insisting that the party stay pro-life, and fight our fiercest pro-life battles at the state level, where they belong.

We also see the downside of Rudy’s deal. If pro-lifers went along, we’d soon find out that a pro-abortion Republican president would no longer preside over a pro-life party. The power a president exerts over his party’s character is nearly absolute. The party is changed in his image. He picks those who run it and, both directly and indirectly, those who enter it.

Thus, the Republicans in the 1980s became Reaganites. The Democrats in the 1990s took on the pragmatic Clintonite mold. Bush’s GOP is no different, as Ross Douthat points out in “It’s His Party” in the March Atlantic Monthly.

A Republican Party led by a pro-abortion politician would become a pro-abortion party. Parents know that, when we make significant exceptions to significant rules, those exceptions themselves become iron-clad rules to our children. It’s the same in a political party. A Republican Party led by Rudy Giuliani would be a party of contempt for the pro-life position, which is to say, contempt for the fundamental right on which all others depend."

[TommyDale]

Click and vote.

[mkjessup]

NOooooooo NOooooooo!!!! We MUST nominate Rudy, because RUDY is the ONLY one who can slay the dreaded Hillary-beast!!! We must SAVE America by electing RUUUUUUUDY!!!!

/sarc off

What's that rumbling? It sounds like the far off gnat-like buzzing of the RudyBots! LOL

Take cover, INCOMING!!!! ;)

[Calpernia]

A Republican Party led by a pro-abortion politician would become a pro-abortion party.

Harvesting Fetal Body Parts

[Vaquero]

NO!

[Calpernia]

Prolife ping

[narses]

While he was the “Republican Mayor” of New York City he appointed more than 60 men and women to the Civil, Criminal, and Family Court benchs. In all of those judicial appointment only two were Republican.

All of his other judical appointments were either registered Liberals or registered Democrats. As the “Republican Mayor” he had appointment power over more than 70 full commissioners in more than 50 City agencies, yet at no time during his administration did REPUBLICANS account for more than 10% of those appointments.

He even appointed Chuck Schumers wife as the City’s Department of Transportation Commissioner.


________________________________________________________________
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/9054.html

“And even as we grieve for those who lost their lives, and our hearts and prayers go out to the victims and their loved ones, we may be able to find some sort of meaning in this tragedy by using it as a catalyst to revive national gun control efforts.”
Rudolph Giuliani +

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

[HuntsvilleTxVeteran]

There is no vote, just a person trying to reap EMAIL addresses!

[Dead Corpse]

Never Rudy McRomney.

Hunter. Paul. Gingrich. Our only real choices. No matter how popular the Big Three RINO's are with the liberal media.

[TommyDale]

Vote here.

[msnimje]

A Republican Party led by a pro-abortion politician would become a pro-abortion party.

I can just see the commercials now.

You may rip your baby apart the week before he his born if that is what you want to do with no penalty whatsoever.

I am Rudy Giuliani and I support this murder.

[Just another Joe]

IF Rudy takes the nomination, I will vote "Yes" over the demoncratic nominee.
To do otherwise is not only foolish but downright stupid.

The place to vote "No" on Rudy is during the primaries, NOT the general election.

[Bosco]

Freepers have already voted on Rudy - twice.

Rudy came in second to Newt Gingrich, and Rudy is now coming in second to Fred Thompson.

[Calpernia]

>>>Vote here.

Oh, I emailed. Well there goes another email address that will hit spam bots.

In one word

NO!

[buck61]

NOT NO BUT, HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[RabidBartender]

"To do otherwise is not only foolish but downright stupid."

Good morning to you, too.

[Blackirish]

Flopsweat

[Calpernia]

I will vote no in Primaries and General Elections.

But, I doubt he will make it to the General. Matter of fact, I'm sure he is stepping out of the race before then.

[RabidBartender]

Drink!!!

[Mike Darancette]

Vote Yes or No on Rudy

That is not the choice we will have.

[msnimje]

Rudy is now coming in second to Fred Thompson.

Last I checked he was coming in third behind (Write-in /Third party/Undecided/Stay home/Leave blank).