I'd respond but I don't want to use the word faggot in a thread about George Will.
I was thinking the same thing. See ya later, I'm off to rehab!
1. You did respond.
2. He is a married man with children, so why would you use that word?
I would. It might get me a date with Ann Coulter.
When you look at issues of consequence which define conservatives and distinguish them from liberals - the key word is Constitution.
Conservatives believe in it and consider a strict interpretation of it the best protection for our liberties.
Consequently, the Second Amendment, like ALL the amendments, are of great significance to us. So are situations like Roe versus Wade and the most recent edict from SCOTUS concerning eminent domain. All these issues impinge on a strict constructionist view of the constitution.
So when a candidate comes along and presents himself for support for office, but has an unrenounced track record of supporting Roe versus Wade, and opposing the traditional view of the Second Amendment, he is a hard sell. There is also the issue of illegal invaders and open borders and that amendment which, adopted after the Civil War to assure that American born ex-slaves were given citizenship, which has been distorted to present a free entry for illegal aliens.
Take all of this together and you have a candidate whose merits are highly questionable.
And I think you know who that candidate is.
But you can't beat somebody with nobody and unless Hunter gets moving or Gingrich stops playing coy, the Wall Street Machers and RINOS will have their way and that candidate will become the only choice we have as an alternative to the Wicked Witch of the East.
Yes. Yes. Sling the mud where reason fears to tread.