Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Man50D

That's an interesting list of states -- not what you would expect if it was a reaction to the superhighway coming through their town. It isn't coming through Washington, or Georgia, or Virginia, or probably Utah or Arizona (although Arizona is a border state so that might also count).


I'll check with my local representatives to find out what the thinking was on the Virginia bill, but I wonder if some of these are in opposition for economic reasons related to other forms of trade. For example, Washington and Virginia both have a large part of their economy in shipping, which could be hurt if it was cheaper to ship goods into mexican ports and then transport them cheaply into the heartland.


12 posted on 03/09/2007 5:51:59 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
It isn't coming through Washington, or Georgia, or Virginia

There was an article a couple of months ago about a super-highway branching off of the one going from Mx through Kansas City on to Canada. The branch superhighway would taverse the southeast US into Florida. That would probably includes additional branches to N.O., L.R./Memphis, Nashville, Atlanta, etc.

You can bet that, if they build the highway from Mexico to Canada, they will add branches to other locations eventually.
15 posted on 03/09/2007 7:33:46 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson