Yep. I admitted my error. I thought I read the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, and it was the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Shoot me, a$$hole.
"2. You made an erroneous comment concerning who could overturn this Court"
I got lazy and took it from another poster. I corrected it. Why didn't you jump on him?
"You jumped to conclusions concerning the majority opinion based on a few lines from the dissent you had read in a news article"
Yep. It was part of a sarcastic comment to a friend. Lighten up.
"4. You don't seem to understand the Miller case at all."
I'll go toe-to-toe with you on Miller any day of the week, you lightweight loser.
How about you tell us where the Judges in this particular case got their Miller conclusions wrong then...
How about actually addressing the verdict instead of insulting people?
Miller?
The case that stands, on a procedural basis, for an individual right interpretation of the second amendment?
you'll go toe-to-toe to defend Miller?
Really?
If you don't agree that Miller demonstrates that the Second Amendment deals with an individual right then you are either an uneducated windbag, a shill or both.
And I'm betting you can't identify my argument within 60 seconds.