To: cryptical; Jaxter
That right existed prior to the formation of the new government under the Constitution and was premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad).Rest easy, Patriots of Lexington and Concord, someone still understands.
Jaxter, we were talking along those lines a few days back, no?
75 posted on
03/09/2007 8:37:15 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Prevent Glo-Ball Warming ... turn out the sun when not in use)
To: NonValueAdded
76 posted on
03/09/2007 8:38:29 AM PST by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: NonValueAdded
"Jaxter, we were talking along those lines a few days back, no? Indeed we were.
603 posted on
03/09/2007 4:01:37 PM PST by
Jaxter
("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
To: NonValueAdded
Rest easy, Patriots of Lexington and Concord, someone still understands.Of course, now the Supreme Court must understand this.
After January 20th 2009, the Supreme Court may look very different with several new justices leaning hard left.
754 posted on
03/10/2007 4:58:35 AM PST by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson