>>I have heard no one criticize her right to free speech.
But there is a time and place for everything. Her faggot joke was at the wrong time, in the wrong place.
IMHO<<
I forgot to add, self-serving and inconsiderate of the setting.
I don't see why this is a hill to fight and die on.
Are you kidding? Let's get real here. CPAC knew exactly what they were getting. She did something very similar last year. They want her because the people want to hear from her. To know feign shock is too much for my cast iron stomach to take. I hate hypocrisy no matter what the source.
Semantic totalitarianism is at the very heart of what needs to change or we've already lost.
"I don't see why this is a hill to fight and die on."
Because if they take this hill, we may lose the war entirely.
The forced endorsement of sexual disorder has tremendously far-reaching ramifications. It could literally destroy western civilization.
When are we going to start fighting back in *any* effective way?
And yes, even saying, "We will not be intimidated into refraining from bad-mouthing you even as you rain a constant storm of vituperation down upon us," is to do more than anyone has been doing to date.
Isn't it slanderous too since the statements are false? Can't she be sued by the family?