Posted on 03/09/2007 6:44:43 PM PST by LdSentinal
I imagine a whole lot of Congressmen would become strong on defense to the tune of $191,473. A small price for the contractors to pay for big contracts.
One word for you, mate:
"Youarefullofcrap"
Respectfully, /s/ An Independent who would walk on hot coals for Duncan Hunter
You have been posting this same crap for weeks. Get some new lies.
heeeeeeeey LJ!
Nice to see you here my friend! Nice to see you on this thread as well! And I quite agree.
Forgot to ping you on #157. That's one funny response you got there. :-)
LBT
-=-=-
But your insinuations that Duncan Hunter is bought and paid for by the Defense Industry is really a cheap shot.
All my relatives in the military are voting for Hunter. those type of pics don't sway them
Thanks, I'll check that out.
LBT
-=-=-
And who are you a shill for, dear?
Thank you for posting this.
The 'flip side' is what we need in order to learn and make informed choices.
That YES on Sarbanes-Oxley is a killer. That is one of the all time WORST bills ever passed!
Mitt? MITT? He's the most dynamic of all of the candidates -- first, second or third tier.
Alright...I'll wait right here for you to link "this same crap" I've been posting for weeks...since is the very first time I've posting about Hunter.
So let me get this straight, a newspaper shows his voting record far from being a "True Conservative" yet some people still call him a "True Conservative"... This is truly bizzare....
Howdy :-)
LBT
-=-=-
He has always been strong on defense starting with his father being a Marine and duncan being in the Viet nam war and his son 2 tours in Iraq.
His record has always been strong, not bought.
Not like draft dodger Rudy and Mitt and his 5 sons who never served.
I'm sure his long association with his friend Randy Cummingham, the hundreds of thousands of dollars he's accepted from defense industries and his record on military contracts is just a coincidence.
I see it the same way. The absolutists think that Fiscal Conservatism trumps all, but we learned the hard way that libs can paint you into a corner when you say you're for family values but won't vote for things like the Family Leave Act. At the very least, republicans should be putting up better alternatives that have more fiscal soundness, but instead the public hears silence and criticizing rather than an equivocal alternative. Having a healthy economy is very important, and free trade has a much better way of building it, but if the benefits won't happen for 10 or more years out, the electorate will vote you out of office before you can see the benefit. So we need free trade policies that work fast. The "rational middle ground" is fair trade.
This article has been around for a long time.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/705954/posts
Multinational companies aren't interested in helping americans build jobs here, they take advantage of loopholes like H1B visas in order to drive wages down. I see it here pretty often in silicon valley.
Do George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan count as draft dodgers as well?
And did you know John McCain was in the military?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.