[...explain how this advances conservatism...]
Because Ann got the "meaning" across using words
liberals understand.
Because Ann gets the media's attention, the same
way Patton did. And Patton knew how to win a
war. I think Ann knows how to win as well.
BTW... Ann did not call Edwards a faggot. Read
the transcript. I think it was a brilliant way
to show what hypocritical wimps liberals are. I
think it also showed that being PC is a big stick
beating Republicans into submission.
The gloves should be OFF!
>>BTW... Ann did not call Edwards a faggot.<<
We all got that. The implication was clear, we know what she was trying to do, etc. We all know that.
We want the same end, no PC thought police, etc. We ALL want that here, I think.
We just disagree about tactics. Some of us just don't happen to think that her tactics were effective, mature, or even particularly funny or witty.
"I think it also showed that being PC is a big stick
beating Republicans into submission.
The gloves should be OFF!"
You are absolutely right!!! And look how well that tactic works on so many on the right!! sickening
Good explanation, Jo. I think that Ann made a very powerful point with incredible conciseness, almost backhanded. The point has been made even more strongly by the reaction from some other conservatives: We must act as is if homosexuality is respectable.
I understand that some people have a different take on the situation, and that's fine.