To: LibWhacker
Flores continued, It is interesting to note that even after 80 years we can still gain a better understanding about the nature of light using refined measurement techniques and creative ideas and therefore are able add to the vast insights of former scientists.
Except when challenging something like the Big Bang by demonstrating that red shift of quasars and galaxies is only partly due to recessional velocity. The answer to this is to refuse publication to those scientists who claim otherwise and to lock them out of the observatories.
27 posted on
03/13/2007 5:21:43 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: aruanan
"Except when challenging something like the Big Bang by demonstrating that red shift of quasars and galaxies is only partly due to recessional velocity. The answer to this is to refuse publication to those scientists who claim otherwise and to lock them out of the observatories."
I think it was Max Planck who observed that an apparent quantum jump in papers on certain topics was really due to the death of "Old Fart" editors of scholastic journals who had suppressed them when they were alive.
So it goes.
39 posted on
03/13/2007 4:24:14 PM PDT by
Panzerlied
("We shall never surrender!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson